UDC

[94(47).084.5+94(47).084.6]:65.012.126

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V430

Authors

Maksim A. Ganin
Cand. Sci. (Hist.), Researcher at Russian State University for the Humanities, Senior Lecturer, Higher School of Social Sciences, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (address: ul. Politekhnicheskaya 29, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russia).
e-mail: maxim-ganin@yandex.ru, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3190-3491

Abstract

The article examines the role of foreign business trips of Soviet scientists, engineers and workers in the implementation of the technical assistance agreement signed with the German company Friedrich Krupp AG, Essen in 1929. The study is based on a wide range of archival materials and personal sources. For the first time, the 1933 “Report on the Inspection of the Contract with the Company Friedrich Krupp AG, Essen (Technical Assistance with High-Quality and Special Steels and Cast Irons)” is introduced, which is kept in the Russian State Archives of Economics. It is noted that, given the specifics of the terms of the agreement, the work of Soviet trainees, carried out under the supervision of commissioners authorized by the Metallurgical Bureau of Foreign Technical Assistance, was the main way of adopting Krupp’s technologies. Despite a number of problems related to the organization of the work of Soviet specialists, the goal of the agreement was achieved: Soviet industry mastered Krupp’s technologies for high-quality steel and cast-iron smelting. This was largely due to the systematic approach to the implementation of the transfer, as well as due to the fact that the position of commissioner was held by competent scientific and technical personnel with a successful track record of adopting foreign technologies. The author notes that cooperation with Krupp continued even after 1933, although the coming to power of the Nazis in Germany significantly complicated further contact with the German side. In 1934, the company set a course for terminating the contract. From then on, the intensity of cooperation with Krupp started to decrease. However, individual trips of Soviet specialists to Essen continued up to 1939.

Keywords

technology transfer, foreign business trips, technical assistance agreement, Soviet industry, Friedrich Krupp AG, German-Soviet cooperation, 1920s – 1930s

References

1. Ul’yanova S.B. Sovetskiy industrial’nyy proekt 1920-kh gg. v regional’nom izmerenii [The Soviet Industrial Project of the 1920s in the Regional Dimension]. Istoricheskie vyzovy i ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii [Historical Challenges and Economic Development of Russia]. Yekaterinburg, 2019, pp. 502–506.
2. Gribacheva A.P. Perestroyka promyshlennogo proizvodstva Leningrada v usloviyakh blokady (1941–1944) [Restructuring of the Industrial Production of Leningrad Under the Blockade (1941–1944)]. Genesis: istoricheskie issledovaniya, 2024, no. 7, pp. 62–75. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-868X.2024.7.43874
3. Salimov N.B. Industrializatsiya v Bashkirskoy ASSR v 1920–1930-e gody (opyt industrializatsii v Rossii) [Industrialization in the Bashkir ASSR in the 1920s – 1930s (the Experience of Industrialization in Russia)]. Arkhiv v sotsiume – sotsium v arkhive [Archives in Society – Society in the Archives]. Chelyabinsk, 2024, pp. 81–84.
4. Alekseev T.V. Znachenie inostrannoy tekhnicheskoy pomoshchi dlya modernizatsii otechestvennoy promyshlennosti sredstv svyazi v 20–30-e gody XX veka [The Importance of Foreign Technical Help for the Modernization of the Native Industry of Communication Facilities in the 20s – 30s of the XXth Century]. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2011, no. 5-2, pp. 13–19.
5. Polovinkin V.N., Fedulov S.V., Barbanel’ B.A., Kosarenko D.A. Ital’yanskaya tekhnicheskaya pomoshch’ pri stroitel’stve kreysera “Kirov” [Italian Technical Assistance in Building the Cruiser Kirov]. Morskoy vestnik, 2021, no. 2, pp. 120–124.
6. Reka A.A. Problemy voennogo sotrudnichestva SSSR i Germanii v 1920-kh – nachale 1930-kh godov [Problems of Military Cooperation Between the USSR and Germany in the 1920s – Early 1930s]. Potemkinskie chteniya [Potemkin Readings]. Sevastopol, 2023, pp. 221–226.
7. Dolgova E.A. Zarubezhnye komandirovki nauchnykh rabotnikov v 1920-e gg.: ritorika i politicheskie otsenki [Foreign Business Trips of Scientific Workers in the 1920s: Rhetoric and Political Assessments]. Porshneva O.S. (ed.). Vremya Kominterna [The Time of the Comintern]. Moscow, 2020, pp. 157–168.
8. Vasina I.I., Zapariy V.V. Zagranichnye komandirovki ural’skikh inzhenerov, uchenykh i rabochikh v kontse 1920-kh – 1930-e gg. [Foreign Business Trips of Ural Engineers, Scientists and Workers in the Late 1920s – 1930s]. Istoriya nauki i tekhniki v sovremennoy sisteme znaniy [History of Science and Technology in the Modern Knowledge System]. Yekaterinburg, 2016, pp. 25–28.
9. Blinov I.S. Germanskaya firma “Fridrikh Krupp” i sovetskiy “parovoznyy zakaz” (1920–1922 gg.) [The German Company “Friedrich Krupp” and the Soviet “Locomotive Order” (1920–1922)]. Istoriya nemtsev Rossii glazami molodykh issledovateley [History of the Germans of Russia Through the Eyes of Young Researchers]. Moscow, 2022, pp. 57–68.
10. Bochinin D.A. Tekhnicheskaya pomoshch’ germanskoy firmy “Krupp” leningradskim metallurgam v proizvodstve vysokokachestvennoy stali dlya aviastroeniya v nachale 1930-kh gg. [Technical Support of German Firm Krupp to Leningrad Metallurgists in High-Grade Steel Production for Aircraft Industry at the Beginning of the 1930s]. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2012, no. 1-1, pp. 38–40.
11. Kosarenko D.A. Sotrudnichestvo sovetskikh predpriyatiy s germanskoy firmoy “Krupp” (konets 1920-kh – nachalo 1930-kh gg.) [Cooperation of Soviet Enterprises with the German Company “Krupp” (Late 1920s – Early 1930s)]. Uchenye zapiski. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2021, no. 3, pp. 5–9.
12. Goldman S. A Fuhrer of Industry: Krupp Before, During, and After Nuremberg. Loyola Los Angel. Int. Comp. Law Rev., 2017, vol. 39, no. 1. Art. no. 9.
13. Harold J. Krupp: A History of the Legendary German Firm. Princeton, 2012. 360 p. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691153407.001.0001
14. Butkovskiy V.P. Inostrannye kontsessii v narodnom khozyaystve SSSR [Foreign Concessions in the National Economy of the USSR]. Moscow, 1928. 123 p.
15. Khramov S.S. (ed.). Industrializatsiya Sovetskogo Soyuza. Novye dokumenty. Novye fakty. Novye podkhody [Industrialization of the Soviet Union. New Documents. New Facts. New Approaches]. Pt. 2. Moscow, 1999. 304 p.
16. Emel’yanov V.S. O vremeni, o tovarishchakh, o sebe [On Time, on Friends and on Oneself]. Moscow, 1968. 361 p.
17. Sevost’yanov G.N. (ed.). Moskva – Berlin: politika i diplomatiya Kremlya, 1920–1941 [Moscow – Berlin: Kremlin’s Policy and Diplomacy, 1920–1941]. Vol. 2. 1927–1932. Moscow, 2011. 854 p.
18. Dubinin S.I. Paradoksy sovetsko-germanskikh industrial’nykh svyazey 1930-kh godov: Uralmash – Rurskaya oblast’ [Paradoxes of Soviet-German Industrial Relations in the 1930s: Uralmash – Ruhr Region]. Vestnik Gumanitarnogo instituta TGU, 2010, no. 2, pp. 13–18.