UDC

81’42

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V405

Authors

Irina A. Anashkina
Dr. Sci. (Philol.), Assoc. Prof., Assoc. Prof. at the Department of English Language for Professional Communication, National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University (address: ul. Bol’shevistskaya 68, Saransk, 430005, Russia).
e-mail: iraida952@gmail.com*, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8111-4437

Inna I. Konkova
Cand. Sci. (Philol.), Assoc. Prof., Assoc. Prof. at the Department of English Language for Professional Communication, National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University (address: ul. Bol’shevistskaya 68, Saransk, 430005, Russia).
e-mail: mirna_13@mail.ru, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3326-0493

Abstract

The article analyses the metastructures of modern English scientific and technical discourse within the framework of two genres: scientific technical report and patent. The paper aimed to compare the metastructures of these genres while highlighting such functions as dialogization, linear order and confirmation of what is being said by means of visuals, as well as evaluation, commentary, interpretation, and attracting attention. The relevance of this article is determined by the necessity to diversify metastucture characteristics of the genres under study. Moreover, it presents the first comparative analysis of the genres of scientific technical report and patent by means of the AntConc corpus analysis toolkit in order to identify the functional features of metastructures. This allows us to study the ways of scientific and technical discourse construction with the emphasis on the category of metadiscursivity. Based on the results of the analysis, the authors draw conclusions about the frequency of use of metastructures in these genres and the genres’ level of metadiscursivity. Moreover, common functions of metastructures and functions only typical of the scientific technical report genre are described. Further, the most and less popular functions of metastructures in both genres are pointed out; the reasons behind their frequency of use are suggested. The research material includes texts of modern scientific technical reports and patents presented as corpora with the total volume of 360 thousand words each. The theoretical significance of the research lies in diversifying metastructures and their use in the genres of scientific and technical discourse. The results can be applied in writing texts in the genres under study with the aim of improving communication at the scientific level.

Keywords

English-language scientific and technical discourse, corpus analysis, scientific technical report, patent, metadiscursivity, metastructure, AntConc

References

1. Bakhtin M.M. Problema rechevykh zhanrov. Iz arkhivnykh zapisey k rabote “Problema rechevykh zhanrov”. Problema teksta [The Problem of Speech Genres. From Archival Records for The Problem of Speech Genres. The Problem of Text]. Bakhtin M.M. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 5. Raboty 1940-kh – nachala 1960-kh godov [Collected Works. Vol. 5. Works of 1940s – Early 1960s]. Moscow, 1996, pp. 159–206.
2. Christie F. Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Functional Perspective. London, 2002. 189 p.
3. Bawarshi A. Genre and the Invention of the Writer: Reconsidering the Place of Invention in Composition. Logan, 2003. 220 p. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt46nxp6
4. Slyshkin G.G. Problema kontseptualizatsii cheloveka v yazyke i diskurse (na materiale kontseptov politicheskikh deyateley) [Conceptualization of Person in the Language and Discourse (Concepts of Politicians)]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta, 2004, no. 11, pp. 86–88.
5. Sherstyanykh I.V. Teoriya rechevykh zhanrov [The Theory of Speech Genres]. Moscow, 2014. 546 p.
6. Vepreva I.T. Metayazykovaya orientatsiya yazykovoy lichnosti v usloviyakh yazykovoy perestroyki [Metalinguistic Orientation of the Linguistic Personality in the Context of Language Restructuring]. Aktivnye yazykovye protsessy kontsa XX veka [Active Linguistic Processes of the Late 20th Century]. Moscow, 2003, pp. 26–28.
7. Lukina N.V. Metatekst i ego funktsii v khudozhestvennom tekste [Metatext and Its Functions in a Fiction Text]. Ritorika i kul’tura rechi v sovremennom informatsionnom obshchestve [Rhetoric and Speech Standards in the Modern Information Society]. Yaroslavl, 2007, pp. 185–189.
8. Zhurkova M.S., Olizko N.S. Metatext as a Way to Form the Meaning of a Fiction Work. Bull. Chelyabinsk State Univ., 2023, no. 2, pp. 30–37 (in Russ.).
9. Kuznetsova A.V. Metatekst v khudozhestvennom tekste: pragmatika i funktsii [Meta-Text in Fiction Text: Pragmatics and Functions]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2020, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 265–269. https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2020.9.49
10. Kudryavtseva M.I. Metatekst v khudozhestvennom diskurse postmoderna: kognitivno-pragmaticheskiy aspekt [Metatext in Postmodern Artistic Discourse: Cognitive-Pragmatic Aspect]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2022, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 2954–2959. https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20220483
11. Plastinina N.A., Plekhanova Yu.V. Uchebnyy metatekst kak osnova formirovaniya i razvitiya chitatel’skoy kompetentsii obuchayushchikhsya [The Use of Educational Metatexts in Developing Students’ Reading Competence]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Ser: Istoriya i filologiya, 2018, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1008–1019.
12. Choi S. Genre Analysis of Metatext of Korean Language Textbook. J. Soc. Korean Lang. Lit., 2023, vol. 76, pp. 325–368. https://doi.org/10.15711/WR.76.0.11
13. Kiose M.I., Izmalkova A.I., Rzheshevskaya A.A., Makeev S.D. Text and Metatext Event in the Gaze Behavior of Impulsive and Reflective Readers. Res. Result Theor. Appl. Linguist., 2023, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 115–135.
14. Wilder S.A. All the (West)World’s a Stage: HBO’s Westworld as Metatext – Intertextuality, Genre, Seriality, Format. J. Pop. Film Telev., 2023, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/01956051.2023.2259056