UDC

373.51

Authors

Kunash Marina Anatolyevna
Murmansk Regional In-Service Training Institute for Education and Culture;Postgraduate Student, Murmansk State Humanities University (Murmansk, Russia)

Abstract

The article focuses on the obstacles for personality development of older teenagers and possible ways of their overcoming by setting up individual learning routes. The author presents her view on the role of the late teens in developing one’s personality that is capable of and striving for self-fulfilment. The paper brings forward the issues of cognitive competence formation prior to specialized training. The author substantiates the term “individual learning route” as a means of forming cognitive competence, taking into account psychological make-up of older teenagers. Psychological and pedagogical requirements for the model of individual learning routes are indicated. The core factor of this new model is the frame-based representation of knowledge. In addition, the paper looks at the efficiency of the traditional approach to individual learning routes of older teenagers prior to specialized training.

Keywords

cognitive competence, individual learning route, older teenagers

References

1. Antonenko E.R. Formirovanie intellektual’no-poznavatel’noy kompetentnosti kak faktora razvitiya kul’tury samostoyatel’noy uchebnoy deyatel’nosti obuchayushchikhsya: avtoref. dis. … kand. ped. nauk [Formation of Intellectual and Cognitive Competence as a Factor in the Development of Students’ Culture of Independent Learning: Cand. Ped. Sci. Diss. Abs.]. Vladikavkaz, 2010. 24 p. 
2. Asmolov A.G. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya i konstruirovanie mirov [Cultural-Historical Psychology and Designing the Worlds]. Moscow, Voronezh, 1996, p. 197. 
3. Vorovshchikov S.G. Vnutrishkol’noe upravlenie razvitiem uchebno-poznavatel’noy kompetentnosti starsheklassnikov: dis. … d-ra ped. nauk [Managing the Development of Training and Cognitive Competence of Senior Pupils Within a School: Dr. Ped. Sci. Diss.]. Moscow, 2007. 416 p. 
4. Glazunova O.I. Mysledeyatel’nostnyy podkhod k vydeleniyu kompetentnostey v obrazovanii i mezhdunarodnoe monitoringovoe issledovanie PIZA [Thought-Activity Approach to Distinguishing Competences in Education and the Programme for International Student Assessment PISA]. Diagnostika obrazovatel’noy uspeshnosti [Diagnosing the Learning Achievements]. Moscow, 2007. 136 p. 
5. Gritsenko L.I. Teoriya i praktika obucheniya: integrativnyy podkhod [Theory and Practice of Education: An Integrative Approach]. Moscow, 2008. 240 p. 
6. Gurina R.V., Sokolova E.E. Freymovoe predstavlenie znaniy [Frame-Based Knowledge Representation]. Moscow, 2005. 176 p. 
7. Kraevskiy V.V., Khutorskoy A.V. Osnovy obucheniya: didaktika i metodika [Fundamentals of Education: Didactics and Methodology]. Moscow, 2008. 352 p. 
8. Pudovkina Yu.N., Rodionov M.A. Osobennosti organizatsii predprofil’noy podgotovki shkol’nikov na osnove ratsional’nogo sochetaniya bazovykh i elektivnykh matematicheskikh kursov [Organization Peculiarities of the Preprofile Training of Pupils on the Basis of a Rational Combination of Basic and Elective Mathematical Courses]. Vestnik Pomorskogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2011. no. 1, pp. 175–182. 
9. Fel’dshteyn D.I. Problemy vozrastnoy i pedagogicheskoy psikhologii [Issues of Developmental and Educational Psychology]. Moscow, 1995. 368 p. 
10. Chernyavskaya A.P. Psikhologicheskoe konsul’tirovanie po professional’noy orientatsii [Psychological Counselling on Vocational Guidance]. Moscow, 2001. 96 p.