UDC

17.021.2+141.201

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V184

Authors

Tat’yana V. Izluchenko
Siberian Federal University; prosp. Svobodnyy 79, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russian Federation;
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5644-301X e-mail: izluchenko@mail.ru

Abstract

This article investigates the role of archaism in the minds of religious extremists and its manifestation in social practices. Religious extremism is a social phenomenon reflecting the desire to, based on religious ideas and the use or threat of violence, radically change the socio-political structure. Moreover, this notion describes actions threatening the socio-political situation at a particular historical stage and appealing to the sacred. Religious beliefs in extremist activity are secondary to the political basis, the archaic nature of consciousness being a priority. This way one can, with minimal elaboration of religious ideology, channel maximal resources to socio-political activity. The emphasis is placed on mythologism, using myths about the golden age and heroes, leaders who suffer and die while trying to restore it. The following archaic features of extremists’ religious consciousness are revealed here: personification of the surrounding world, sacrifice and acceptability of violence, as well as conviction about the special role of the leader, direct participation of the sacred and ability to influence objective processes. The archaic nature of religiosity contributes to the development of groupthink. It is based on a radicalized “Us vs Them” idea and an opposition between objective social reality (as false) and constructed reality (as true), and is reinforced by social isolation and a lack of critical thinking. Religious extremists position themselves as true believers who, by their actions, maintain the world order and contribute to the victory of good over evil. The central place in the worldview is given to the sacred, seen as being able to directly participate in communication and exercise social control, as well as impose punishment and delegate its powers. Religious extremists consider their actions and ideas to be divinely inspired, while violence,  an effective and the only possible method. By replacing certain meanings of information and analogies with others, radicalized, and by presenting alternative interpretations of religious ideas, they foster beliefs in religious superiority and identify their political actions with adherence to religious precepts.

Keywords

archaic consciousness, religious consciousness, the sacred, religious extremism, violence, sacrifice, groupthink, mythologism

References

1. Akhromeeva Yu.V. Sotsiokul’turnye osnovy religioznogo ekstremizma [Sociocultural Foundations of Religious Extremism: Diss.]. Voronezh, 2009. 178 p.

2. Tokarev S.A. Rannie formy religii [Early Forms of Religion]. Moscow, 1990. 622 p.

3. Frazer J.G. The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. London, 1923 (Russ. ed.: Frezer Dzh.Dzh. Zolotaya vetv’: Issledovanie magii i religii. Moscow, 2012. 854 p.).

4. Shakhbanova M.M. Religiosity and Religious Behavior: Theoretical and Methodological Approaches of Research. Cauc. Sci. Bridge, 2020, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 29–41 (in Russ.).

5. Stepanova E.A. Postsekulyarnaya religioznost’: individ versus institut [Post-Secular Religiosity: Individual versus Institute]. Religiovedenie, 2015, no. 3, pp. 56–65.

6. Kolyakina E.A. Opredelenie sushchnosti ponyatiya “religioznost’” [Defining the Essence of the Concept of Religiosity]. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.A. Nekrasova. Ser.: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Sotsial’naya rabota. Yuvenologiya. Sotsiokinetika, 2007, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 51–55.

7. Breskaya O.Yu. Izuchenie religioznosti: k neobkhodimosti integral’nogo podkhoda [The Study of Religiosity: On the Need for an Integral Approach]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2011, no. 12, pp. 77–87.

8. Yablokov I.N. Religioznoe soznanie: spetsifika, urovni, reprezentatsii [Religious Consciousness: Specificity, Levels, Representations]. Voprosy filosofii, 2018, no. 2, pp. 46–55.

9. Amit S., Barua L., Kafy A.A. Countering Violent Extremism Using Social Media and Preventing Implementable Strategies for Bangladesh. Heliyon, 2021, vol. 7, no. 5. Art. no. e07121. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07121

10. Sledzevskiy I.V. Desecularization of the World Community as Tension Source in the International Relations and World Politics. Outl. Glob. Transform. Politics Econ. Law, 2018, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 30–45 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2018-11-4-30-45

11. Pretus C., Hamid N., Sheikh H., Ginges J., Tobeña A., Davis R., Vilarroya O., Atran S. Neural and Behavioral Correlates of Sacred Values and Vulnerability to Violent Extremism. Front. Psychol., 2018, vol. 9. Art. no. 2462. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02462

12. Leybovich O.L. Arkhaichnye praktiki v sovremennoy kul’ture [Archaic Practices in Modern Culture]. Kul’turnyy kod, 2018, no. 1, pp. 40–45.

13. Davydov S. The Chief and His Sacral Power. Wisdom, 2016, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 72–78. DOI: 10.24234/wisdom. v1i6.64

14. Metlitskaya Z.Yu. Henry More as a Critic of “Charismatic Religiosity”. Filosofiya religii: analiticheskie issledovaniya, 2020, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 27–41 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.21146/2587-683X-2020-4-1-27-41

15. Eliade M. Svyashchennoe i mirskoe [The Sacred and the Profane]. Moscow, 1994. 144 p.

16. Llorent-Bedmar V., Cobano-Delgado Palma V.C., Navarro-Granados M. Islamic Religion Teacher Training in Spain: Implications for Preventing Islamic-Inspired Violent Radicalism. Teach. Teach. Educ., 2020, vol. 95. Art. no. 103138. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2020.103138

17. Arvisais O., Bruyère M.-H., Chamsine C., Mahhou M.A. The Educational Intentions of the Islamic State Through Its Textbooks. Int. J. Educ. Dev., 2021, vol. 87. Art. no. 102506. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102506