UDC

81’276

DOI

https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V146

Authors

Natal’ya O. Orlova
Yaroslavl Higher Military Institute of the Air Defense; prosp. Moskovskiy 28, Yaroslavl, 50057, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1081-5102 e-mail: tashaorlova25@yandex.ru

Oksana Yu. Bogdanova
Yaroslavl Higher Military Institute of the Air Defense; prosp. Moskovskiy 28, Yaroslavl, 50057, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6895-4087 e-mail: dictema@mail.ru

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to identify the specific functions of slang from the standpoint of demonstrativeness, corporatism, and individual creative self-expression. The methods of comparative and cultural analysis were used. As a result, the following specific functions of slang were singled out: demonstrative, corporate, and the function of creative self-expression. Personal identification and social relationships determine the demonstrative function of slang, which is more pronounced in the speech of young people. Slangisms are distinguished by their vividness and imagery, which is caused by the desire of the individual to attract people’s attention and stand out from the crowd. At the same time, the opposition of slang to the established order can have a negative effect, when used ostentatiously. The corporate function of slang is fulfilled by indicating one’s belonging to a certain professional community and asserting one’s right to be considered as “one of us”. Ignorance of special slang hinders a person from fully functioning within a certain “corporation”. The abundance of slang synonyms, as well as the presence of whole sentences and phraseological units in slang, testifies to the creative potential of their inventors. This article provides examples of American and Russian slang units used in various semantic fields, as well as examples of slang homonymy. Comparison of stylistic synonyms confirms the fact that slangisms differ from their neutral and bookish equivalents due to their metaphorical as well as emotional and evaluative nature. The results of the study allow us to conclude that slang has much in common with folk art, in which the changing value orientations of modern society are manifested. We also found that slang holds a dominant position in the framework of non-standard lexicon. Due to the continuous evolution, slang is a rather volatile phenomenon that allows new words and expressions to quickly enter the vocabulary.

For citation: Orlova N.O., Bogdanova O.Yu. The Functional Purpose of Slang (Based on Russian and American Slangisms). Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2021, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 98–104. DOI: 10.37482/2687-1505-V146

Keywords

functions of slang, personal identification, social language, demonstrativeness, corporatism, creative self-expression

References

1. Karasik V.I. Yazykovoy krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [Language Circle: Personality, Concepts, Discourse]. Volgograd, 2002. 477 p.
2. Popova Z.D., Sternin I.A. Yazyk i natsional’naya kartina mira [Language and National Worldview]. Voronezh, 2003. 58 p.
3. Bulaeva N.E, Medvedev M.I. O roli slenga v sovremennom angliyskom yazyke [On the Role of Slang in Contemporary English]. Universitet XXI veka: Nauchnoe izmerenie [University of the 21st Century: Scientific Dimension]. Tula, 2019, pp. 385–387.
4. Grubin I.V. Sleng v amerikanskom angliyskom yazyke, obshchiy obzor [Slang in American English: A General Overview]. Sovremennye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk [Current Problems of the Humanities and Natural Sciences]. Moscow, 2017, pp. 80–84.
5. Krupina O.G. Znachenie slenga v angliyskom yazyke [The Meaning of Slang in the English Language]. Vektor razvitiya sovremennoy nauki [Vector of Development of Modern Science]. Moscow, 2018, pp. 29–30.
6. Knyazeva D.A., Chigina N.V. Osobennosti slenga v angliyskom yazyke [Features of Slang in the English Language]. Innovatsionnaya nauka, 2016, no. 11-2, pp. 108–110.
7. Zhoglo Yu.A. Variativnost’ peredachi na russkiy yazyk funktsional’nykh variantov angliyskogo komp’yuternogo slenga [Variations in Translating Functional Equivalents of English Computer Slang into Russian]. Yazykovaya lichnost’ i perevod [Linguistic Personality and Translation]. Minsk, 2018, pp. 46–49.
8. Rudenko M.V., Kisel’ V.S. Sovremennyy angliyskiy sleng i ego vliyanie na russkiy yazyk [Contemporary English Slang and Its Influence on the Russian Language]. Yazyk i kul’tura [Language and Culture]. Makeevka, 2018, pp. 46–48.
9. Dunaevskaya T.A. Strukturnye i semanticheskie osobennosti ekspressivno- kollokvial’noy leksiki v sovremennykh angliyskom i russkom yazykakh [Structural and Semantic Features of Expressive Colloquial Vocabulary in Contemporary English and Russian: Diss.]. Cherepovets, 2005. 298 p.
10. Valeeva N.T. O dearkhaiziruyushchey funktsii zhargonnogo slovoobrazovaniya v sovremennom russkom yazyke [On the De-Archaizing Function of Slang Word Formation in Contemporary Russian]. Sharonov I.A. (ed.). Agressiya v yazyke i rechi [Aggression in Language and Speech]. Moscow, 2004, pp. 165–173.
11. Beregovskaya E.M. Molodezhnyy sleng: formirovanie i funktsionirovanie [Youth Slang: Formation and Functioning]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 1996, no. 3, pp. 32–41.
12. Jay T. Why We Curse: A Neuro-Psycho-Social Theory of Speech. Philadelphia, 2000. 328 p.
13. Suslyakov T.D., Suslyakova O.N., Lysenkova E.Yu. Sleng kak yavlenie sovremennogo obshchestva [Slang as a Phenomenon of Modern Society]. Nauchno-metodicheskiy elektronnyy zhurnal “Kontsept”, 2016, vol. 12, pp. 26–30. Available at: http://e-koncept.ru/2016/46206.htm (accessed: 31 May 2021).
14. Shuminov I.R. Sleng kak lingvokul’turnyy fenomen [Slang as a Linguocultural Phenomenon]. Innovatsii i perspektivy sovremennoy nauki. Filologicheskie nauki [Innovations of and Prospects for Modern Science. Philology]. Astrakhan, 2018, pp. 93–97.
15. Mel’nikova A.A. Yazyk i natsional’nyy kharakter: Vzaimosvyaz’ struktury yazyka i mental’nosti [Language and National Character: The Relationship Between the Structure of Language and Mentality]. St. Petersburg, 2003. 320 p.
16. Gamov A.N. Sravnitel’nyy analiz obshchego i spetsial’nogo slenga v makrosisteme angliyskogo prostorechiya [A Comparative Analysis of General Slang in the Macrosystem of Sub-Standard English]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Ser.: Teoriya yazyka. Semiotika. Semantika, 2016, no. 1, pp. 151–163.
17. Orlova N.O., Bogdanova O.Yu., Kramarenko O.L., Moshkina Yu.V. Leksiko semanticheskie polya amerikanskogo i russkogo slenga [Lexico-Semantic Fields of American and Russian Slang]. Kazanskaya nauka, 2021, no. 5, pp. 112–114.
18. Spears R. NTC’s Dictionary of American Slang and Colloquial Expressions. Chicago, 2000. 560 p.
19. Nikitina T.G. Molodezhnyy sleng: Tolkovyy slovar’: bolee 12 000 slov; svyshe 3000 frazeologizmov [Youth Slang: Explanatory Dictionary: Over 12,000 Words; Over 3000 Phraseological Units]. Moscow, 2004. 912 p.
20. Potebnja A.A. Slovo i mif [Word and Myth]. Moscow, 1989. 622 p.
21. Zvegintsev V.A. Yazyk i lingvisticheskaya teoriya [Language and Linguistic Theory]. Moscow, 2001. 248 p.
22. Orlova N.O. Sleng kak sposob tvorcheskogo samovyrazheniya [Slang as a Means of Creative Self-Expression]. Inostrannye yazyki v vysshey shkole, 2011, no. 1, pp. 53–57.
23. Danilova M.E. Sposoby obrazovaniya slengovykh edinits [Means of Slang Unit Formation]. Vestnik obrazovatel’nogo konsortsiuma “Srednerusskiy universitet”. Ser.: Gumanitarnye nauki, 2018, no. 12, pp. 87–92.
24. Partridge E. Slang Today and Yesterday: With a Short Historical Sketch and Vocabularies of English, American and Australian Slang. New York, 1979. 476 p.