UDC

81ʼ27

DOI

https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V142

Authors

Evgeniya E. Demidova
Institute of Foreign Languages; 12-ya liniya V.O. 13, St. Petersburg, 199178, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0151-5316 e-mail: Demidova_Eu@mail.ru

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to describe the symbolic component among the primary (motivating) signs of the STRENGTH/POWER macroconcept. Objectives of the article: 1) to identify a complete list of motivating signs of the STRENGTH/POWER macroconcept; 2) to single out symbolic signs among them; 3) to describe the ways of objectification of symbolic primary signs and provide examples from the Russian language. This research is relevant due to the importance of describing the special class of symbolic macroconcepts. The scientific novelty of the paper lies in the fact that for the first time the STRENGTH/POWER macroconcept is presented in the aspect of its primary signs. The key research methods used here are descriptive, interpretive, and conceptual, as well as component analysis of dictionary definitions. The author revealed 59 motivating signs of the STRENGTH/POWER macroconcept on the basis of 10 etymological and historical-etymological dictionaries. None of the dictionaries used contain a complete set of primary signs of this macroconcept. The large number of motivating signs indicates that STRENGTH/POWER is an important macroconcept, whose primary signs have syncretic nature. Eight out of 59 motivating signs are symbolic, which is 1/7 of the total number. This ratio is a sufficient basis for classifying the STRENGTH/POWER macroconcept as symbolic. The language material from the National Corpus of the Russian Language shows the relevance of all the identified symbolic signs. Symbolic primary signs of the STRENGTH/POWER macroconcept in Russian linguoculture can be presented in the form of three blocks: 1) the transcendental (‘god’, ‘general name of the second angelic rank’, ‘miracles’); 2) the vital component of a person (‘spirit’, ‘soul’, ‘life’); 3) unusual human abilities (‘divine gift of producing miracles’, ‘ability to make changes in other things’).

For citation: Demidova E.E. Symbolic Macroconcept Strength/Power in the Aspect of primary Signs. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2021, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 53–63. DOI: 10.37482/2687-1505-V142

Keywords

macroconcept STRENGTH/POWER, primary sign of a concept, motivating sign of a concept, concept structure, Russian linguistic worldview, Russian linguoculture

References

1. Pimenova M.V. Kontsepty vnutrennego mira (russko-angliyskie sootvetstviya) [Concepts of the Inner World (Russian-English Equivalents): Diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2001. 497 p.
2. Kolesov V.V. “Pervosmysl” kontsepta [“Pervosmysl” of the Concept]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Yazyk i literatura, 2018, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 438–452. DOI: 10.21638/spbu09.2018.309
3. Kolesov V.V. Kontsept kul’tury: obraz – ponyatie – simvol [The Concept of Culture: Image – Notion – Symbol]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 2: Istoriya, yazykoznanie, literaturovedenie, 1992, no. 2, pp. 30–40.
4. Pimenova M.V. Kontsept serdtse: obraz, ponyatie, simvol [The Concept of Heart: Image, Notion, Symbol]. Kemerovo, 2007. 500 p.
5. Potebnya A.A. Vnutrennyaya forma slova [Inner Form of the Word]. Available at: http://cito-web.yspu.org/link1/metod/met137/node4.html (accessed: 3 November 2020).
6. Krushevskiy N.V. Ocherk nauki o yazyke [Essay on Linguistics]. Izvestiya i uchenye zapiski Imperatorskogo Kazanskogo universiteta [Bulletin and Proceedings of the Imperial Kazan University]. Kazan, 1883. Vol. 19, pp. 1–48.
7. Shekhovtseva T.M. Verbalizatsiya kontsepta “sila” v sovremennom angliyskom yazyke [Verbalization of the Concept of Power in Modern English: Diss.]. Belgorod, 2011. 189 p.
8. Rusakova O.F. Sovremennaya politicheskaya filosofiya. Predmet, kontsepty, diskurs [Contemporary Political Philosophy. Subject, Concepts, Discourse]. Yekaterinburg, 2012. 400 p.
9. Weaver K., Motion J., Roper J. From Propaganda to Discourse (and Back Again): Truth, Power, the Public Interest and Public Relations. L’Etang J., Pieczka M. (eds.). Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice. Mahwah, 2006, pp. 7–21.
10. Pimenova M.V. Sila kak klyuchevoy kontsept russkoy kul’tury [Power as a Key Concept of Russian Culture]. Pimenova M.V. (ed.). Izmenyayushchayasya Rossiya i slavyanskiy mir: novoe v kontseptual’nykh issledovaniyakh [The Changing Russia and the Slavic World: New Findings in Conceptual Research]. Sevastopol, 2009, pp. 280- 290.
11. Mironov A.S. Kontsept sily v sisteme tsennostey russkoy byliny [On the Concept of the Power in Russian Bylina’s Value System]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Ser.: Istoriya. Filologiya. Kul’turologiya. Vostokovedenie, 2017, no. 2, pp. 35–49. DOI: 10.28995/2686-7249-2017-2-35-49
12. Emel’yanova N.N. “Myagkaya sila” kak kontsept: kriticheskiy analiz [“Soft Power” as a Concept: A Critical Analysis]. Mezhdunarodnaya analitika, 2018, no. 3, pp. 7–24.
13. Rusakova O.F. Kontsept “myagkoy” sily (soft power) v sovremennoy politicheskoy filosofii [The Concept of “Soft Power” in Contemporary Political Philosophy]. Nauchnyy ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava Ural’skogo otdeleniya RAN, 2010, no. 10, pp. 173–192.
14. Lopareva D., Kipenko M. Kontsept VLAST’ v sovremennoy publitsistike: aksiologicheskiy aspekt [The Concept POWER in Modern Journalism: An Axiological Aspect]. Lambert Academic Publishing, 2012. 168 p.
15. Pimenova M.V. Vlast’ i politika: metafory v diskurse SMI [Power and Politics: Metaphors in Media Discourse]. Lingvoritoricheskaya paradigma: teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty, 2012, no. 17, pp. 147–153.
16. Sheygal E.I. Vlast’ kak kontsept i kategoriya diskursa [Power as a Concept and Category of Discourse]. Esse o sotsial’noy vlasti yazyka [Essays on the Social Power of Language]. Voronezh, 2001, pp. 57–64.
17. Erofeeva I.V. Kontsept “Vlast’” v mediadiskurse: dikhotomiya reprezentatsii [Concept “Power” in Media Discourse: Dichotomy of Representation]. Vestnik Chitinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2009, no. 1, pp. 167–171.
18. Vrazhnova I.G. Metaforicheskaya reprezentatsiya vlastnykh struktur v sovremennykh rossiyskikh i amerikanskikh SMI [Metaphorical Representation of Authorities in Power in Modern Mass Media of Russia and USA]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Ser.: Filologiya. Zhurnalistika, 2009, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 25–32.
19. Shabanova A.A. Reprezentatsiya kontsepta “vlast’”/“power” v amerikanskoy i russkoy lingvokul’turakh [Representation of the Concept of Power in American and Russian Linguocultures: Diss.]. Ulyanovsk, 2011. 159 p.
20. Vasil’ev A.D. Verbalizatsiya kontsepta “vlast’” v yazykovom soznanii krasnoyartsev [The Verbalization of the Concept “Power” in the Linguistic Consciousness of Krasnoyarsk Citizens]. Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V.P. Astaf’eva, 2015, no. 2, pp. 207–213.
21. Goryaev N.V. Sravnitel’nyy etimologicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Comparative Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Tiflis, 1896. 558 p.
22. Izyumov M.M. Opyt slovarya russkogo yazyka sravnitel’no s yazykami indo-evropeyskimi [The Experience of the Dictionary of the Russian Language Compared with the Indo-European Languages]. St. Petersburg, 1880. 599 p.
23. Preobrazhenskiy A.G. Etimologicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Moscow, 1910–1914. Iss. 2. 416 р.
24. Semenov A.V. Etimologicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Moscow, 2003. 704 p. Available at: https://lexicography.online/etymology/semyonov/s/sila (accessed: 22 April 2021).
25. Sreznevskiy I.I. Materialy dlya slovarya drevnerusskogo yazyka po pis’mennym pamyatnikam [Materials for the Dictionary of the Old Russian Language Based on Written Monuments]. St. Petersburg, 1912. Vol. 3. 1684 р.
26. Fasmer M. Etimologicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Vol. 3. Moscow, 1987. 824 р.
27. Chernykh P.Ya. Istoriko-etimologicheskiy slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Historical and Etymological Dictionary of Contemporary Russian]. Moscow, 1999. Vol. 2. 560 p.
28. Shanskiy N.M., Bobrova T.A. Shkol’nyy etimologicheskiy slovar’ [The School Etymological Dictionary]. Available at: http://www.slovorod.ru/etym-shansky/shan-s.htm (accessed: 15 February 2018).
29. Shaposhnikov A.K. Etimologicheskiy slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Etymological Dictionary of Contemporary Russian]. Moscow, 2016. Vol. 2. 576 р.
30. Shimkevich F.S. Korneslov russkogo yazyka, sravnennogo so vsemi glavneyshimi slavyanskimi narechiyami i s dvadtsat’yu chetyr’mya inostrannymi yazykami [Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language, Compared with All the Main Slavic Dialects and with Twenty-Four Foreign languages]. St. Petersburg, 1842. Pt. 2. 167 р.