UDC

81’42(045)

DOI

https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V513

Authors

Tatyana V. Lopashenkova - PhD student, Leading Specialist at the Institute for the Training of Scientific and Pedagogical Personnel Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russia,
e-mail: bamh@mail.ru, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0835-8984

Abstract

Nowadays, when anthropogenic pressure on the environment is increasingly exacerbating global environmental problems, the need for effective tools to overcome the environmental crisis, including through communication, is particularly important. In this regard, the study of environmental discourse, which helps shape social environmental awareness by identifying the connections between words, actions, and the state of the ecosystem, is becoming increasingly important. The aim of this study is to analyze environmental media discourse from a linguopragmatic perspective, identifying and systematizing the set of positively emotive linguistic means used in implementing communicative tactics within the «pathos» category of persuasive strategies. A brief review of scholarly works devoted to this type of discourse is provided. An interpretation of the linguistic tools used by the authors of the articles from the online media outlet The Ecologist, a reputable journal specializing in environmental issues, is given. Three communication tactics are identified that serve as a means of implementing the «pathos» category of persuasion strategy through the positive emotional coloring of a message: the tactic of declaring a positive assessment, the tactic of declaring a positive forecast, and the tactic of demonstrating positive performance results. Along with the use of vocabulary with positive connotations characteristic of all the identified tactics, specific features inherent to each tactic were also identified. Thus, the tactic of declaring a positive assessment is characterized by the use of contrasts, the tactic of declaring a positive forecast is characterized by the use of linguistic devices relating the statement to a future plan, which vary depending on the author’s degree of confidence in their forecast, and the tactic of demonstrating positive performance results is characterized by the predominance of expressive language, including phraseological units.

Keywords

linguopragmatics, environmental discourse, strategy of persuasion, pathos, tactic of declaring a positive assessment, tactic of declaring a positive forecast, tactic of demonstrating positive performance results, English media discourse

References

1. Golomidova M.V., Gladiy A.E. Ekologicheskiy diskurs i aspekty ego izucheniya v rossiyskoy lingvistike [Environmental Discourse and Aspects of Its Study in Russian Linguistics]. Russian Linguistic Bulletin, 2024, no. 5, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.60797/RULB.2024.53.15
2. Gromorushkina A.A. Ekologicheskiy diskurs kak kompleksnoe yavlenie [Environmental Discourse As a Complex Phenomenon]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2020, no. 3, pp. 36–46.
3. Merzlyakova N.P., Karelina M.A. Lingvostilisticheskie osobennosti ekologicheskih lozungov (na materiale angliyskogo yazyka) [Linguistic and Stylistic Features of Environmental Slogans (Based on the English Language)]. Mnogoyazychie v obrazovatel’nom prostranstve, 2025, no.1, pp. 81–90. https://doi.org/10.35634/2500-0748-2025-17-1-81-90
4. Zaytseva A.V. Tipologiya tekstov ekologicheskogo diskursa FRG [Text Typology of the Ecological Discourse in Germany]. Cand. philol. sc. thesis. Smolensk, 2014. 253 p.
5. Ivanova E.V. Ekolingvistika i rol’ metafory pri opisanii ekologicheskih problem [Ecolinguistics and the Role of Metaphor in Describing Environmental Problems]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2007, no. 13, pp. 34–38.
6. Basinskaya M.V. Issledovanie leksiko-semanticheskih osobennostey ekologicheskogo diskursa v ramkah yazykovoy ekologii [Research of Lexical-Semantic Features of Ecological Discourse within the Framework of Linguistic Ecology]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, 2014, no. 20, pp. 32–41.
7. Lagutina A.A. Dominantnye ekologicheskie realii v sovremennom nemetskom gazetno-publitsisticheskom diskurse i sredstva ih yazykovoy kategorizatsii [Dominant Environmental Realities in Contemporary German Newspaper and Journalistic Discourse and Means of Their Linguistic Categorization]. Cand. philol. sc. thesis. Voronezh, 2013. 262 p.
8. Semenova S.N. Kognitivno-pragmaticheskie kharakteristiki diskursa v predmetnoy oblasti «Gornye ekosistemy» [Cognitive-Pragmatic Characteristics of Discourse in the Subject Area «Mountain Ecosystems»]. Cand. philol. sc. thesis. Krasnodar, 2014. 227 p.
9. Steciag M. Environmental Discourse in Public Debate in Poland: Relativization, Exclusion and Acceptance. Lang. Ecol., 2010, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–16.
10. Bromley P., Meyer J.W., Ramirez F.O. The Worldwide Spread of Environmental Discourse in Social Studies, History, and Civics Textbooks, 1970–2008. Comp. Educ. Rev., 2011, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 517–545.
11. Mariani M., Borghi M. Environmental Discourse in Hotel Online Reviews: A Big Data Analysis. J. Sustain. Tour, 2020, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 829–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1858303
12. Chang Ch.H., Armsworth P.R, Masuda Yu.J. Environmental Discourse Exhibits Consistency and Variation Across Spatial Scales on Twitter. BioScience, 2022, vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 789–797. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac051
13. Shevtsova V.A. Realizatsiya kommunikativnyh strategiy i taktik v ekologicheskom diskurse. Inostrannye yazyki: innovatsii, perspektivy issledovaniya i prepodavaniya [Implementation of Communicative Strategies and Tactics in Ecological Discourse]. Proceedings of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the Belarusian State University. Minsk, 2021, pp. 362–366.