CC..png   

16plus.png

Legal and postal addresses of the founder and publisher: Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, 17, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation

Editorial office address: Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series "Humanitarian and Social Sciences", 56 ul. Uritskogo, Arkhangelsk

Phone: (8182) 21-61-20, ext. 18-20
E-mail: vestnik_gum@narfu.ru
https://vestnikgum.ru/en/

ABOUT JOURNAL

Shock Advertising: Destruction of Traditional Values and Norms in Contemporary Russian Society. P. 109-120

Версия для печати

Section: Philosophy

Download (pdf, 0.5MB )

UDC

[130.2:339.13.028](045)

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V504

Authors

Elena А. Nozdrenko - Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Assoc. Prof., Assoc. Prof. at the Department of Advertising and Sociocultural Work, Siberian Federal University (address: prosp. Svobodnyy 79, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russia).

e-mail: elena.nozdrenko@mail.ru, ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1384-1090

Abstract

This article explores the effect of shock advertising on the deconstruction of traditional values and norms in contemporary Russian society. The research is based on a comprehensive methodology that includes a theoretical analysis of key concepts of deconstruction, social communication and advertising psychology. In addition, the paper analyses specific cases of shock advertising using semiotic and content analysis and identifies mechanisms employed by shock advertising to influence collective consciousness. The paper focuses on such aspects as the blurring of identity and sense of belonging, nihilism and moral relativism. Considering the increasing role of media communications and the fragmentation of the sociocultural space, shock advertising that intentionally violates generally accepted ethical and moral standards is becoming particularly important as a factor in the transformation of value orientations. The paper aimed to identify the mechanisms and consequences of the impact of provocative advertising images on collective consciousness as well as to assess their influence on social stability. The results obtained indicate an ambivalence of the effect of shock advertising, manifested in its ability to not only stimulate critical reflection on the established norms and expand the boundaries of discourse but also undermine social stability, exacerbate inequality and manipulate collective consciousness. The analysis demonstrates a need for a critical understanding of the goals and methods of shock advertising in order to minimize negative social consequences and ensure a responsible approach to the formation of the sociocultural environment. The results contribute to the study of the dynamics of value changes in contemporary society and can be used for further analysis of advertising discourse.

Keywords

shock advertising, traditional values, social norms, identity, ethics, manipulation of collective consciousness

References

  1. Lotman Yu.M. Semiosfera [Semiosphere]. St. Petersburg, 2001. 703 p.
  2. Yakoba I.A., Khalilov A.R. Diskursivnyy epatazh v rossiyskoy reklame [Discourse Shocking in Russian Advertising]. Sovremennyy diskurs-analiz, 2021, no. 1, pp. 3–14.
  3. Heidegger M. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen, 1993. 445 p. (Russ. ed.: Khaydegger M. Bytie i vremya. Kharkov, 2003. 503 p.).
  4. Derrida J. De la Grammatologie. Paris, 1967. 448 p. (Russ. ed.: Derrida Zh. O grammatologii. Moscow, 2000. 512 p.).
  5. Kornienko T.A. Epatazhnyy marketing v sovremennom reklamnom diskurse [Shock Marketing in Modern Advertising Discourse]. Sovremennye SMI i reklama: tendentsii, perspektivy razvitiya [Modern Mass Media and Advertising: Trends and Prospects for Development]. Lugansk, 2018, pp. 96–100.
  6. Sotsioanaliz P’era Burd’e. Al’manakh Rossiysko-frantsuzskogo tsentra sotsiologii i filosofii Instituta sotsiologii Rossiyskoy Akademii nauk [Pierre Bourdieu’s Sociological Analysis. Almanac of the Russian-French Centre for Sociology and Philosophy of the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Moscow, 2001. 288 p.
  7. Dolganov R.A., Zubkova O.S. Fenomen politkorrektnosti v sfere shou-biznesa (na materiale amerikanskikh periodicheskikh izdaniy) [The Phenomenon of Political Correctness in Show Business (Based on American Periodicals)]. Yazyk. Obrazovanie. Kul’tura [Language. Education. Culture]. Kursk, 2019, pp. 215–228.
  8. Balabanova D.A. Rol’ epatazha v reklame [The Role of the Shocking Advertising]. Nauchnye trudy SeveroZapadnogo instituta upravleniya RANKhiGS, 2014, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 181–184.
  9. Nozdrenko E.A., Kaysina A.V. O kommunikativnoy effektivnosti ispol’zovaniya epatazha v politicheskoy, sotsial’noy i kommercheskoy reklame [On the Communicative Effectiveness of Using Provocation in Political, Social, and Commercial Advertising]. Marketingovye kommunikatsii, 2014, no. 3, pp. 162–173.
  10. Stepanov V.N. Provotsirovanie v sotsial’noy i massovoy kommunikatsii [Provocation in Social and Mass Communication]. St. Petersburg, 2008. 268 p.
  11. Ryazhskikh E.A., Astanina I.V. Epatazhnye reklamnye mediateksty s rechevoy neodnoznachnost’yu i ikh vospriyatie potrebitelem: lingvoeticheskiy aspekt [Epatage Advertising Media Texts with Speech Ambiguity and Consumer Perception of These Texts: Linguoethics Aspect]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Filologiya. Zhurnalistika, 2020, no. 1, pp. 71–76.
  12. Pashutin S.B. Nepristoynost’ i skabreznost’ v marketingovykh kommunikatsiyakh [Indecency and Obscenity in Marketing Communications]. Marketing v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2007, no. 2, pp. 70–79.
  13. Goryunova S.A., Mkrtumova I.V. Vyzyvayushchaya reklama, ili kak reklamodateli privlekayut vnimanie molodezhi k produktam bystrogo pitaniya cherez epatazh [Shock Advertising, or How Advertisers Attract Young People’s Attention to Fast Food Products Through Provocation]. Vektory sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii: sovremennye vyzovy i vozmozhnosti [Vectors of Russia’s Socioeconomic Development: Current Challenges and Opportunities]. Cheboksary, 2024, pp. 170–179. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-109637
  14. Ivanova E.A., Palagina I.V., Proshkin S.S. Shock, Epatage and Provocation as Stereotypic Methods of Influence in Texts of Mass Communications. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Ser. 2. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2018, no. 1, pp. 80–94 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26653/2076-4685-2018-1-08
  15. Tikhomirova L.S., Kyrkunova L.G., Myalitsina I.P. Shock Advertising as a Type of Social Advertising. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2016, no. 6, pp. 138–143. https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2227-6564.2016.6.138
  16. Festinger L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, 1957. 291 p. (Russ. ed.: Festinger L. Teoriya kognitivnogo dissonansa. Moscow, 2018. 256 p.).

Make a Submission


знак_анг.png

INDEXED IN:      

DOAJ_logo-colour.png

Elibrary.ru

коперник2.png

infobaseindex

logotype.png


Логотип.png


Лань

OTHER NArFU JOURNALS: 

Journal of Medical and Biological
Research

Forest Journal 
obl_les2023.jpg 

Arctic and North  

AiS.jpg

Продолжая просмотр сайта, я соглашаюсь с использованием файлов cookie владельцем сайта в соответствии с Политикой в отношении файлов cookie, в том числе на передачу данных, указанных в Политике, третьим лицам (статистическим службам сети Интернет).