UDC

81’374(=111)(045)

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V500

Authors

Mikhail V. Metelev - Teaching Assistant at the Higher School of Linguistics, Institute of Education and the Humanities, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University (address: ul. A. Nevskogo 14, Kaliningrad, 236041, Russia).

е-mail: mvmetelev1@kantiana.ru, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1189-2959

Abstract

Description of the meaning of polysemous abstract nouns remains one of the most difficult challenges in contemporary cognitive lexicography. This study aims to develop a methodology for constructing a dictionary entry for abstract nouns in contemporary English, with particular attention to their conceptual nature, semantic structure and cognitive mechanisms underlying polysemization. Abstract nouns are linguistic units that name intangible concepts such as qualities, emotions and states. They lack concrete referents and present difficulty for lexicographers. The research material was selected from a range of contemporary lexicographic sources (Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary & Thesaurus, Merriam-Webster Dictionary, WordNet 3.1, Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, and Collins COBUILD Advanced Learner’s Dictionary) as well as major corpus databases, namely, the British National Corpus, the Corpus of Contemporary American English, Sentence Stack, and News on the Web (NOW) Corpus. Analysing data from language corpora is one of the most important tools in lexicographic practice, allowing us to identify the most common and relevant cases of actualization of the meaning of lexical units as well as to deepen our understanding of the mechanisms for meaning recognition by participants in a communicative act in various types of discourse. Integrating classical lexicographic methods with the tools of artificial intelligence (large language models) allows us not only to identify and describe lexical meanings but also to forecast possible semantic evolution in the structure of polysemous abstract nouns. The article proposes a dictionary entry structure based on the principles of cognitive lexicography.

Keywords

cognitive linguistics, cognitive lexicography, conceptual mechanisms, polysemy, abstract noun, semantic structure, large language model

References

1. Ostermann C. Cognitive Lexicography: A New Approach to Lexicography Making Use of Cognitive Semantics. Berlin, 2015. 392 p. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110424164
2. Kövecses Z., Csabi S. Lexicography and Cognitive Linguistics. Rev. esp. lingüíst. apl., 2014, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.27.1.05kov
3. Evans V., Green M. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh, 2018. 830 p.
4. Vol’skaya Yu.A. Sozdanie slovarya abstraktnykh sushchestvitel’nykh v russkom yazyke: kriterii otbora leksiki [Creation of a Russian Abstract-Noun Dictionary: Selection Criteria for Lexical Entries]. Filologiya i kul’tura, 2020, no. 1, pp. 38–44.
5. Zabotkina V.I., Boyarskaya E.L. Words and Meanings at the Crossroads of Mental Spaces of Language and Culture. RSUH/RGGU Bull. Lit. Theory Linguist. Cult. Stud. Ser., 2022, no. 4, pt. 3, pp. 300–311 (in Russ.).
6. Boyarskaya E.L. Polisemiya i kognitivnyy kontekst [Polysemy and Cognitive Context]. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. Vyp. XVI. Yazykovoe soznanie i kognitivnoe modelirovanie [Cognitive Studies of Language. Iss. 16. Linguistic Consciousness and Cognitive Modelling]. Moscow, 2014, pp. 265–271.
7. Nikitin M.V. Polisemiya na predele (shirokoznachnost’) [Polysemy at the Limit (Broad Meaning)]. Kubryakova E.S. (ed.). Kontseptual’noe prostranstvo yazyka [Conceptual Space of Language]. Tambov, 2005, pp. 102–103.
8. Chaabo A. Semantic Multiplicity: How Lexical Ambiguity Elicit Imperfect Organizational Discourse Sustaining Category Ambiguity in Case of NPD. Vienna, 2022. 30 p.
9. Boldyrev N.N. Cognitive Schemas of Linguistic Interpretation. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki, 2016, no. 4, pp. 10–20 (in Russ.).
10. Cherneyko L.O. Lingvofilosofskiy abstraktnyy analiz imeni [An Abstract Linguistic and Philosophical Analysis of Nouns]. Moscow, 2018. 272 p.
11. Bäck A. Aristotle’s Theory of Abstraction. New York, 2014. 311 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04759-1
12. Boldyrev N.N. Yazyk kak interpretiruyushchiy faktor poznaniya [Language as an Interpretive Factor of Cognition]. Boldyrev N.N. (ed.). Interpretatsiya mira v yazyke [Interpretation of the World in Language]. Tambov, 2017, pp. 19–81.
13. Torrent T.T., Hoffmann T., Almeida A.L., Turner M. Copilots for Linguists: AI, Constructions, and Frames. Cambridge, 2024. 122 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009439190
14. Louwerse M.M. Understanding Artificial Minds Through Human Minds. The Psychology of Artificial Intelligence. London, 2025. 216 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003491095
15. Marcondes F.S., Gala A., Magalhães R., Perez de Britto F., Durães D., Novais P. Natural Language Analytics with Generative Large-Language Models: A Practical Approach with Ollama and Open-Source LLMs. Cham, 2025. 84 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76631-2