UDC

811.111:81ʼ373

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V435

Authors

Kseniya A. Melnikova
Cand. Sci. (Philol.), Senior Lecturer, Foreign Languages Department, Yaroslavl State Technical University (address: Moskovskiy prosp. 88, Yaroslavl, 150064, Russia).
e-mail: ledeja@yandex.ru, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1998-7963

Abstract

Nowadays, effective communication is one of the primary goals of a modern person. In particular, successful communication is determined by the pragmatics of linguistic means used by communicators. Despite the presence of neutralized vocabulary in all spheres of discourse, the phenomenon of linguopragmatic neutralization is still understudied. The use of neutralized vocabulary in the English-language academic discourse deserves special attention since the exchange of information and dissemination of scientific knowledge are not only major goals of education, but also guarantees of the progressive development of scientific and technological sector. This knowledge exchange is done primarily in English, which is a language of international communication. The author analysed authentic materials from official websites of Western universities containing recommendations on composing and writing texts that can be attributed to the genre of academic discourse (academic essays, graduate qualification papers, etc.). It was found that most educational institutions suggest using so-called inclusive language, based on the principle of political correctness. According to the results, the most effective ways of neutralizing discriminatively marked lexical units in academic discourse are the non-use of gendered pronouns, replacement of gendered pronouns with articles, use of passive instead of active voice constructions, use of plural pronouns to denote one person, use of gender-neutral pronouns, and transformation of gendered address. Thus, neutralization in academic discourse is primarily applied when dealing with gender identity, which may be due to the changes in the socio-cultural life of society and the attitude of society towards the problems of discrimination and social inequality.

Keywords

discrimination, markedness, gender identity, linguopragmatic neutralization, inclusive language, English-language academic discourse

References

1. Babayan V.N. Opredelenie lingvopragmaticheskikh osobennostey zagolovka v angloyazychnom mediadiskurse [Headlines in English Language Media Discourse: Linguopragmatic]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Ser.: Istoriya i filologiya, 2024, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 324–336.
2. Sternin I.A. Nepolitkorrektnye naimenovaniya lits v yazykovom soznanii nositelya yazyka [Politically Incorrect National Names in Language Consciousness of Language’s Possessor]. Politicheskaya lingvistika, 2013, no. 1, pp. 191–197.
3. Leontovich O.A. The Dynamics of Political Correctness, Inclusive Language and Freedom of Speech. Russ. J. Linguist., 2021, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 194–220 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-1-194-220
4. Kirilina A.V. Gendernye issledovaniya v lingvisticheskikh distsiplinakh [Gender Studies in Linguistic Disciplines]. Kirilina A.V. (ed.). Gender i yazyk [Gender and Language]. Moscow, 2005, pp. 7–30.
5. Mel’nikova K.A. Lingvopragmaticheskaya neytralizatsiya diskriminatsionno markirovannykh yazykovykh sredstv v mediadiskurse (na materiale anglo- i russkoyazychnykh mediaistochnikov) [Linguopragmatic Neutralization of Discriminatively Marked Linguistic Units in Media Discourse (on the Material of English- and Russian-Language Media Sources): Diss.]. Yaroslavl, 2024. 224 p.
6. Taheri M. Language and Cultural Identity: Qualitative Research on Learning English as a Foreign Language (EFL) in a Monolingual Society. LAP, 2021. 84 p.
7. Melnikova K.A., Chekunova E.M. Identification of the Most Productive Ways to Neutralize Discriminatory Labeled Lexical Units in Accordance with the Principle of Political Correctness in Media Discourse. Sci. J. Mod. Linguist. Methodical-and-Didactic Res., 2022, no. 4, pp. 57–64. https://doi.org/10.36622/MLMDR.2023.30.26.006
8. Florence É. Arianne Gaetano, Out to Work: Migration, Gender and the Changing Lives of Rural Women in Contemporary China. China Perspect., 2016, vol. 2016, no. 3, pp. 73–74. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.7062
9. Grey S. Subject-Verb Agreement and the Singular They. Available at: https://indiancopyeditors.wixsite.com/copyeditor/single-post/2016-1-22-subjectverb-agreement-and-the... (accessed: 1 August 2024).
10. Babayan V.N. Osnovnye sposoby realizatsii vtorichnoy nominalizatsii v mediadiskurse [The Basic Methods of Implementing Secondary Nominalisation in Media Discourse]. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka, 2024, no. 1-2, pp. 246–249.
11. Boldyrev N.N. Kontseptual’naya derivatsiya kak osnova beskonfliktnoy yazykovoy kommunikatsii [Conceptual Derivation as the Basis of Conflict-Free Language Communication]. Tri “L” v paradigme sovremennogo gumanitarnogo znaniya: lingvistika, literaturovedenie, lingvodidaktika [The Three L’s in the Paradigm of the Modern Humanities Knowledge: Linguistics, Literature Studies, Linguodidactics]. Moscow, 2024, pp. 15–22.
12. Abdualieva Z.U. Neytralizatsiya – vazhneyshiy sistemoobrazuyushchiy faktor v semanticheskoy mikrostrukture ekvonimov-giponimov [Neutralization – the Most Important System-Forming Factor in the Semantic Microstructure of Hyponyms Equonyms]. International Scientific Review of the Problems of History, Cultural Studies and Philology: Collection of Scientific Articles. XII International Correspondence Scientific Specialized Conference. Boston, 2020, pp. 4–10.
13. Telegina O.V. Obuchenie priemam emfatizatsii i neytralizatsii konnotativnogo komponenta v khode analiza leksicheskikh, stilisticheskikh i kombinatornykh transformatsiy pri perevode khudozhestvennogo teksta [Teaching Ways of Emphasizing and Neutralizing of Connotation While Using Lexical Transformations in Translation of Fiction]. Obrazovanie i pedagogika: sovremennye trendy [Education and Pedagogy: Modern Trends]. Cheboksary, 2020, pp. 85–98. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-75872
14. Zamyshlyaeva Yu.S. Gendernaya neytralizatsiya v sovremennom angliyskom yazyke [Gender Neutralization in Modern English]. Filologicheskie i sotsiokul’turnye voprosy nauki i obrazovaniya [Philological and Sociocultural Issues of Science and Education]. Krasnodar, 2021, pp. 146–152.
15. Shmelev D.N. Problemy semanticheskogo analiza leksiki (na materiale russkogo yazyka) [Problems of Semantic Analysis of Vocabulary (Based on the Russian Language)]. Moscow, 1973. 280 p.
16. Sviridova E.A. Vzaimodeystvie knizhnoy i razgovorno-prostorechnoy leksiki v sovremennoy presse [Interaction Between Literary and Vernacular Vocabulary in the Modern Press: Diss.]. Michurinsk, 2013. 242 p.
17. Coseriu E. Logique du langage et logique de la grammaire. Coseriu E. L’homme et son langage. Louvain, 2001, pp. 141–164.
18. Boldyrev N.N. Osnovy kognitivnoy teorii beskonfliktnoy yazykovoy kommunikatsii [Foundations of the Cognitive Theory of Conflict-Free Language Communication]. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka, 2024, no. 2-1, pp. 27–31.
19. Ostrovskaya T.A. Evfemizatsiya i obratnye protsessy v sovremennom povedencheskom diskurse [Euphemisation and Return Processes in a Modern Behavioural Discourse]. Vestnik Adygeyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 2: Filologiya i iskusstvovedenie, 2012, no. 3. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/evfemizatsiya-i-obratnye-prot-sessy-v-sovremennom-povedencheskom-d... (accessed: 5 February 2025).
20. Leonovich E.O. Ob ispol’zovanii nekotorykh traditsionnykh norm obrashcheniya v angliyskom yazyke [On the Use of Some Traditional Norms of Address in English]. Inostrannye yazyki v shkole, 2006, no. 5, pp. 87–92.
21. Yurkevich A.S. Genderno-neytral’nye mestoimeniya v sovremennom angliyskom yazyke [Gender-Neutral Pronouns in Modern English]. Politekhnicheskiy molodezhnyy zhurnal, 2021, no. 11. Art. no. 1.