UDC

1(091)11

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V411

Authors

Elena N. Sobolnikova
Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Assoc. Prof., Assoc. Prof. at the Department of Social Sciences, Humanities, Economics and Law, North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov, Assoc. Prof. at the Department of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines, Saint Petersburg State Chemical and Pharmaceutical University (address: ul. Professora Popova 14, lit. A, St. Petersburg, 197022, Russia).
e-mail: sobolnikova.elena@pharminnotech.com, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8129-1855

Natalia V. Dorodneva
Cand. Sci. (Pedagog.), Assoc. Prof., Assoc. Prof. at the Department of Philological Disciplines, Tyumen State Medical University (address: ul. Odesskaya 54, Tyumen, 625023, Russia).
e-mail: dorodnevanv@tyumsmu.ru*, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9756-6750

Abstract

L. Shestov and G.W.F. Hegel were concerned with the problem of truth and knowledge. The genuine dialectical relationship between necessity and freedom, according to Hegel, is expressed in the return of the absolute to itself as a realized unity of itself and its own other. As a result, the hidden power of absolute truth erodes the limitations of particular definitions, forcing one to pass over into another and return to itself in a new, truer form. While Hegel thought of the history of philosophy as a series of necessary stages in the advancement of truth and knowledge, Shestov was sceptical of the claims about the necessity and possibility of absolute knowledge. The purpose of our research is to demonstrate the specific features of the philosophical interpretation of Hegel’s ideas in the works of religious existentialist Shestov, as well as to generalize Shestov’s understanding of the principles of correlating the categories of faith and reason when dealing with the problem of truth through the interpretation of Hegel’s philosophy. This approach seems acceptable, since the two thinkers differ significantly in their understanding of the process of searching for truth, which found expression in their views on the very course of the historical-philosophical process. Shestov believed that a study of the history of philosophy allows us to grow and develop through a free and committed attitude towards truth and knowledge. For him, such a commitment is a criterion by which we can judge whether we have a genuine experience of knowing the truth. For Hegel, our experience in pursuing the truth is not a product of the history of philosophy, but a process underlying the history of philosophy. Therefore, the experience of truth, a self-reflection on the contradictions, is an experience of a continuous process of moving away from the familiar towards something new, where knowledge appears as an endless process of liberating thought from the burden of non-existence, a revival of the miracle of thinking as the creation of the impossible.

Keywords

history of philosophy, Hegel, Shestov, epistemology, metaphysics, experience of truth

References

1. Gutova S.G. Posledniy neoplatonik: mezhdu mistikoy i ratsio (sinkretizm v filosofii Georga Vil’gel’ma Fridrikha Gegelya) [The Last Neoplatonist: Between Mysticism and Ratio (Syncretism in the Philosophy of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel)]. Nemetskaya filosofiya vtoroy poloviny XVIII – kontsa XIX veka [German Philosophy of the Second Half of the 18th – Late 19th Centuries]. Nizhnevartovsk, 1999, pp. 116–144.
2. Leusiere V.A. The Concept of Optimistic Rationalism of G.W.F. Hegel in Existential Philosophy of L.I. Shestov. Bull. Chelyabinsk State Univ., 2015, no. 9, pp. 164–170 (in Russ.).
3. Shestov L. Athens and Jerusalem. Athens, 1966. 447 p.
4. Beaumont M. Lev Shestov: Philosopher of the Sleepless Night. London, 2021. 216 p. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350151185
5. Girinsky A.A. Critique of Hegelian Philosophy in the Works of Søren Kierkegaard and Lev Shestov. Hist. Philos., 2020, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 27–38 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-5869-2020-25-1-27-38
6. Minakov M.A. Return to the Most Important: Philosophical Revolt of Leo Shestov. Hist. Philos., 2018, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 82–95 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-5869-2018-23-1-82-95
7. Voznyak V.S., Zayats T.M. Problema istiny v kontekste razlicheniya rassudka i razuma [The Problem of Truth in the Context of Distinguishing Between Intellect and Reason]. Masloboeva O.D. (ed.). Poisk istiny i pravda zhizni v prostranstve sovremennoy kul’tury [The Search for Truth and the Truth of Life in the Space of Modern Culture]. St. Petersburg, 2018. Iss. 4, pp. 107–116.
8. Shestov L. Penultimate Words and Other Essays. Boston, 1916. 205 p.
9. Shestov L. All Things Are Possible. London, 1920. 244 p.
10. Zhukova O.I., Zhukov V.D. Russkaya filosofskaya irratsionalisticheskaya kul’tura na rubezhe XIX–XX vekov (na materiale tvorchestva L. Shestova) [Russian Philosophical Irrationalist Culture at the Turn of the 19th – 20th Centuries (Based on the Works of L. Shestov)]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv, 2021, no. 55, pp. 14–21. https://doi.org/10.31773/2078-1768-2021-55-14-22
11. Hegel G.W.F. Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford, 1977. 595 p.
12. Hegel G.W.F. Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion: Together with a Work on the Proofs of the Existence of God. London, 1895. Vol. 1. 349 p.
13. Wittgenstein L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London, 1961. 166 p.
14. Bulgakov S.N. Nekotorye cherty religioznogo mirovozzreniya L. Shestova [Some Aspects of Lev Shestov’s Religious Worldview]. Bulgakov S.N. Sochineniya. T. 1. Filosofiya khozyaystva. Tragediya filosofii [Works. Vol. 1. Philosophy of Economy. The Tragedy of Philosophy]. Moscow, 1993, pp. 519–537.
15. Bonetskaya N.C. The Wonderer and His Aim (the L. Shestov’s Hermeneutics). Voprosy filosofii, 2015, no. 7, pp. 95–110 (in Russ.).