UDC

[17.023.33+17.026.4]:004.8

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V381

Authors

Ellen Martin

PhD, Research Associate, University of Leeds (address: Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom).

e-mail: Ellenmrtn@googlemail.com, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9489-9931

Abstract

The idea of posthuman future as an inevitable prospect is being actively postulated by the theorists of transhumanism and posthumanism. The article makes an attempt to identify the key ideas and essential characteristics of hypothetical posthumanity as it is presented in transhumanistic and posthumanistic readings. Against the background of the active development and use of bio- and nanotechnologies, entailing the practice of technological invasion of human biological nature, and postulating the idea about the need to overcome the anthropological boundary between the human and non-human worlds, the topic of posthumanity becomes an integral part of philosophical and anthropological discourse. The author of the article performed a comparative analysis of the conceptual contours of transhumanism and posthumanism. Posthumanism is based on the idea of inclusiveness that refutes the exclusive role of man. It deprives humans of the privileged ethical and ontological status, placing them on par with nonhuman creatures, technologies and objects. Transhumanism pursues the same ultimate goal as posthumanism: the achievement of posthumanity. Transhumanism, aimed at improving human nature with the help of scientific and technical means outside the context of moral principles, reduces a person to an object of uncontrolled technical manipulations. In transhumanism and posthumanism, two hypothetical models (forms of existence) of а non-human future can be singled out: technologically modified and hybrid. Both models are characterized by the destruction of the fundamental anthropological constants, blurring the boundaries between the human and the non-human. The posthuman world in transhumanistic and posthumanistic projections has no connection to the issues of morality, free will, spiritual or moral values. Rejecting the human world, proponents of transhumanism and posthumanism offer prospects of non-human civilization with unpredictable axiological orientations.

Keywords

posthuman, posthumanity, posthumanism, transhumanism, inclusiveness, hybridity

References

1. Susen S. Reflections on the (Post-)Human Condition: Towards New Forms of Engagement with the World? Soc. Epistemol., 2022, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 63–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2021.1893859
2. Forlando L., Glabau D. Cyborg. London, 2024. 221 p.
3. Belobragina A.S. Transhumanism and Posthumanism: Two Ways Towards Posthuman. Econ. Soc. Res., 2023, no. 3, pp. 136–143 (in Russ.).
4. Kriman A.I. The Idea of the Posthuman: A Comparative Analysis of Transhumanism and Posthumanism. Russ. J. Philos. Sci., 2019, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 132–147. https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-4-132-147
5. Rostova N.N. Myagkaya sila postgumanizma. Chto nam meshaet myslit’ po-russki? [The Soft Power of Posthumanism: What Prevents Us from Thinking in Russian?]. Moscow, 2022. 184 p.
6. Huxley J. Knowledge, Morality and Destiny. Psychiatry, 1951, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 129–140.
7. Huxley J. New Bottles for New Wine. London, 1957. 318 p.
8. Esfandiary F.M. Are You a Transhuman? Monitoring and Stimulating Your Personal Rate of Growth in a Rapidly Changing World. New York, 1989. 227 p.
9. More M. H±: True Transhumanism. 2009. Available at: https://metanexus.net/h-true-transhumanism (accessed: 7 October 2021).
10. Kurtz P. Meaning and Value in a Secular Age: Why Eupraxsophy Matters. New York, 2011. 361 p.
11. Pearce D. The Hedonistic Imperative. 1995. Available at: https://www.hedweb.com/hedab.htm (accessed: 5 October 2021).
12. Drexler K.E. Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology. New York, 1987. 320 p.
13. Bostrom N. The Transhumanist FAQ. A General Introduction. Version 2.1. Oxford, 2003. 56 p.
14. Clarke S., Savulescu J., Coady C.A.J., Giubilini A., Sanyal S. (eds.). The Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate. Oxford, 2016. 292 p.
15. Singleton A. Fist Human Receives Neuralink Brain Chip Implant, Says Elon Musk. Telegraph, 31 January 2024. Available at: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/01/31/elon-musk-claims-win-in-sci-fi-brain-implant/ (accessed: 19 March 2024).
16. Ferrando F. Philosophical Posthumanism. London, 2019. 296 p. (Russ. ed.: Ferrando F. Filosofskiy postgumanizm. Moscow, 2022. 360 p.).
17. Badmington N. Posthumanism. Clarke B., Rossini M. (eds.). The Routledge Companion to Literature and Science. New York, 2011, pp. 374–384.
18. Braidotti R. The Posthuman. Cambridge, 2013. 237 p. (Russ. ed.: Braydotti R. Postchelovek. Moscow, 2021. 408 p.).
19. Nayar P.K. Posthumanism. Cambridge, 2013. 208 p.
20. Sterling B. The Manifesto of Speculative Posthumanism. Wired, 3 February 2014. Available at: https://www.wired.com/2014/02/manifesto-speculative-posthumanism (accessed: 19 February 2021).
21. Wolfe C. What Is Posthumanism? Minneapolis, 2010. 392 p.
22. Hayles N.K. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago, 1999. 364 p.
23. Braidotti R. Posthuman Knowledge. Cambridge, 2019. 210 p.
24. Braidotti R. Transposition: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge, 2006. 316 p.
25. Haraway D. A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s. Haraway D. The Haraway Reader. New York, 2004, pp. 7–45.
26. Haraway D. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago, 2003. 65 p.
27. Pepperell R. Posthumans and Extended Experience. J. Evol. Technol., 2005, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 27–41.
28. Barad K. Posthumanist Performativity: Towards an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter Signs. J. Women Cult. Soc., 2003, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
29. Bennett J. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, 2010. 200 p.