UDC

94(47).084.3:316.485.2

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V331

Authors

Abstract

The article dwells on the assassination of V.V. Vorovsky, head of the Soviet delegation at the international conference in Lausanne, on May 10, 1923 and on the trial of M. Conradi and A.P. Polunin as viewed by Russian socialist émigrés, i.e. members of the Socialist Revolutionary Party and social democrats (Mensheviks). This paper aimed to study the attitude of the socialist community of Russian émigrés towards individual political terror during the 1920s. The methodology is based on the principles of intellectual history, which allow us to shed some light on the perception of the 1923 Lausanne trial by analysing the confrontation and ideological struggle of certain political figures and civic groups for attention. The paper provides a brief description of the main works of Russian and foreign historians who studied the assassination of Vorovsky and the trial of his murderers. The context of the trial, the reaction of different émigré camps and the organization of Conradi and Polunin’s defence are analysed. The official response of the Foreign Delegation of the Socialist Revolutionary Party, reflected in the Revolutionary Russia journal, is noted. Particular attention is given to the unpublished article “Both Are Worse” (1923) by leader of the Russian Socialist-Revolutionary Party V.M. Chernov on the results of the trial in Lausanne. Chernov’s argumentation and his views on the fundamental differences between the pre-revolutionary Socialist Revolutionary terror and the assassination of Vorovsky are analysed. Chernov points out that Socialist Revolutionary and Narodnaya Volya’s terror stayed within a strict moral and ethical framework that forbade political assassinations on the territory of free democratic countries. Socialist Revolutionary terrorists had never followed the path of least resistance, proclaiming the idea of selfsacrifice. Chernov emphasizes that only those not involved in the White Terror can hold others accountable for the Red Terror. The paper considers the response of Russian social democrats abroad, in particular, leader of the émigré Mensheviks F.I. Dan’s article dedicated to the Lausanne trial. His thesis about the exclusive right of socialist parties to fight the Bolshevik dictatorship, without involving the White movement, is emphasized. A conclusion is drawn that Russian socialists abroad held a fundamentally unified position on resisting political terror.

Keywords

V.V. Vorovsky, political terror, trial of Conradi and Polunin, Lausanne trial, Socialist Revolutionary Party

References

1. Aubert T. L’affaire Conradi: Plaidoirie prononcée pour Arcadius Polounine devant le Tribunal Criminel de Lausanne, les 14 et 15 novembre 1923. Geneva, 1924. 132 p.
2. Ober C. Rech’ Obera, proiznesennaya v zashchitu Polunina pered sudom prisyazhnykh v Lozanne po delu ob ubiystve Vorovskogo [Speech by Ober, Delivered in Defence of Polunin Before the Jury in Lausanne in the Case of Vorovsky’s Assassination]. Belgrade, 1924. 102 p.
3. Chlenov S.B. Rech’ po delu ob ubiystve V.V. Vorovskogo [Speech in the Case of the V.V. Vorovsky’s Assassination]. Moscow, 1923. 22 p.
4. Chlenov S.B. Ubiystvo V.V. Vorovskogo i burzhuaznoe pravosudie [Assassination of V.V. Vorovsky and Bourgeois Justice]. Kharkov, 1924. 50 p.
5. Zhukovskiy N.P. Posol novogo mira: O zhizni, revolyutsionnoy, literaturnoy, nauchnoy i diplomaticheskoy deyatel’nosti V.V. Vorovskogo [Ambassador of the New World: V.V. Vorovsky’s Life and Revolutionary, Literary, Scholarly and Diplomatic Activities]. Moscow, 1978. 318 p.
6. Gattiker A. L’affaire Conradi. Bern, 1975. 323 p.
7. Senn A.E. Assassination in Switzerland: The Murder of Vatslav Vorovsky. Madison, 1981. 220 p.
8. Capol G. Die Affäre Conradi 1923. Bündner Jahrbuch. Chur, 2002. Vol. 44, pp. 159–171.
9. Franco R.M. The Last White Victory: Aleksandr Guchkov and the Conradi-Polunin Process of 1923. Revolut. Russ., 2023, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 76–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546545.2023.2210006
10. Franco R.M. The Conflicting Soviet Responses to the Lausanne Process (1922–1924). MGIMO Rev. Int. Relat., 2023, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 81–108. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2023-3-90-81-108
11. Vasil’eva N.Yu. Vatslav Vatslavovich Vorovsky. Torkunov A.V. (ed.). Izvestnye diplomaty Rossii: ministry inostrannykh del – XX vek [Famous Russian Diplomats: Foreign Ministers, 20th Century]. Moscow, 2007, pp. 156–163.
12. Ganin A. “Krasnyy terror” v cherno-belom izobrazhenii [“Red Terror” in Black and White]. Rodina, 2019, no. 7, pp. 126–129.
13. Doykov Yu.V. Pitirim Sorokin v Prage (1922–1923) [Pitirim Sorokin in Prague (1922–1923)]. Arkhangelsk, 2009. 146 p.
14. Dragunov V.P. Novye fakty o gibeli V.V. Vorovskogo [New Facts About V.V. Vorovsky’s Death]. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’, 1989, no. 4, pp. 130–141.
15. Skolyar Yu.N. Delo primireniya: ot diplomatii do kul’tury. Pamyati Vatslava Vorovskogo [The Reconciliation: From Diplomacy to Culture. Dedicated to the Memory of Vatslav Vorovsky]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 27: Globalistika i geopolitika, 2017, no. 1, pp. 86–94.
16. Chistyakov K.A. Pokushenie M. Konradi na glavu sovetskoy delegatsii V.V. Vorovskogo v Lozanne 10 maya 1923 g. [M. Conradi’s Assassination Attempt on the Head of the Soviet Delegation V.V. Vorovsky in Lausanne on May 10, 1923]. Novyy istoricheskiy vestnik, 2002, no. 1, pp. 118–120.
17. Chistyakov K.A. Ubit’ za Rossiyu!: Iz istorii russkogo emigrantckogo “aktivizma”, 1918–1939 gg. [Murdered for Russia!: From the History of Russian Emigrant “Activism”, 1918–1939]. Moscow, 2000. 139 p.
18. Lomonosova M.V., Ageeva A.I., Vasilyeva D.I. “Sushchestvuyushchiy krizis vlasti mozhet byt’ ves’ma zatyazhnym”. Stranitsy perepiski Aleksandra Guchkova s Pitirimom Sorokinym [“The Current Crisis of Power Can Be Quite Prolonged”. Correspondence Between Alexander Guchkov and Pitirim Sorokin]. Nasledie, 2020, no. 2, pp. 133–145. https://doi.org/10.31119/hrtg.2020.2.9
19. “Parizhskiy filosof iz russkikh evreev”: pis’ma M. Aldanova k A. Amfiteatrovu [“A Parisian Philosopher and Russian Jew”: M. Aldanov’s Letters to A. Amfiteatrov]. Minuvshee [Bygone Times]. Moscow, 1997. Iss. 22, pp. 539–621.
20. Shmelev I.S. Zashchitniku russkogo ofitsera Konradi – Gospodinu Oberu, kak material dlya dela [To Mr. Ober, Defender of Russian Officer Conradi, as Material for the Case]. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 7 (dop.). Eto bylo: Rasskazy. Publitsistika [Collected Works. Vol. 7 (Suppl.). This Happened: Accounts. Opinion Articles]. Moscow, 1999, pp. 402–404.
21. Demidova O. Dialog Varshavy i Parizha ob aksiologii emigratsii (na materiale pisem D. Filosofova k Z. Gippius i gazety “Za svobodu!”) [The Dialogue Between Warsaw and Paris on the Axiology of Emigration (on the Basis of Letters by Dmitry Filosofov to Zinaida Gippius and the “For Freedom!” Newspaper)]. Napis, 2018, no. 24, pp. 120–135. https://doi.org/10.18318/napis.2018.1.8
22. Korostelev O., Sсhruba M. (eds.). “Sovremennye zapiski” (Parizh, 1920–1940). Iz arkhiva redaktsii [“Modern Notes” (Paris, 1920–1940). From the Editorial Archives]. Vol. 3. Moscow, 2013. 1016 p.
23. Bakhmetev B.A. “Sovershenno lichno i doveritel’no!”: B.A. Bakhmetev – V.A. Maklakov. Perepiska. 1919–1951. T. 2. Sentyabr’ 1921 – may 1923 [“Strictly Personally and Confidentially!”: B.A. Bakhmetev – V.A. Maklakov. Correspondence. 1919–1951. Vol. 2. September 1921 – May 1923]. Moscow, 2002. 672 p.
24. Mel’gunov S.P. Krasnyy terror v Rossii, 1918–1923 [Red Terror in Russia, 1918–1923]. Moscow, 1990. 207 p.
25. Morozov K.N. “It Wasn’t Like That”: Discussions About Terror in the Socialist Revolutionary Party During the Civil War. Idei i idealy, 2019, vol. 11, no. 1, pt. 2, pp. 327–355 (in Russ.).
26. Konovalova O.V., Fedorova V.I. V.M. Chernov: ot terrorizma k patsifizmu. Evolyutsiya mirovozzreniya i realii Sovetskoy Rossii [V.M. Chernov: From Terrorism to Pacifism. Evolution of His Views and Soviet Russia’s Realities]. Rossiyskaya istoriya, 2016, no. 1, pp. 116–130.