UDC

94(47).081+34.047

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V330

Authors

Abstract

This article examines the discussions by the zemstvo assemblies of the circular request of the Ministry of Internal Affairs about the possibility of banning volost elders and volost clerks from being elected as zemstvo deputies. Based on the materials of minute books and resolutions of the zemstvo assemblies, as well as reports of the zemstvo administrations, the main points of view on this issue are singled out. Five standpoints of the zemstvo assemblies and zemstvo administrations are considered here: to preserve the right of volost elders and volost clerks to be elected, to preserve the right of volost elders to be candidates, to ban volost elders from being candidates, to ban volost clerks from being candidates, and to ban volost elders and volost clerks from being candidates. The article provides key arguments of zemstvo representatives for preserving (voters’ trust and good knowledge of the needs of the peasant population) or abolishing (dependence on the land captains who are zemstvo deputies and difficulty of combining the work as a deputy with the official duties in the peasant administration) the right to be elected for the abovementioned officials in peasant self-government. Further, the paper presents zemstvo initiatives to introduce additional changes to the articles of the Statute on Zemstvo Institutions in order to protect the rights of peasant zemstvo deputies when executing their duties as such (restricting the discretionary power of land captains and banning land captains from being elected as zemstvo deputies). The discussion of these initiatives and their criticism are presented. Furthermore, a memorandum by the head of the Economy Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs is introduced into academic discourse, demonstrating the distribution of the standpoints of the zemstvos on the right of volost elders and volost clerks to be candidates in zemstvo elections and the suggestions of the department’s leadership on how to solve this issue.

Keywords

zemstvo elections, peasant electoral rights, volost clerk, volost elder, Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Empire, Statute on Zemstvo Institutions

References

1. Kulikov V.V. Stanovlenie zemskogo samoupravleniya: zakonodatel’stvo i praktika [Formation of Zemstvo Self- Government: Legislation and Practice]. Kirov, 2009. 335 p.
2. Svechnikov N.I., Sintsov G.V. Formirovanie osnov zemskogo izbiratel’nogo prava v period podgotovki i provedeniya reform mestnogo samoupravleniya vo vtoroy polovine XIX veka [Laying the Foundation for Zemstvo Electoral Law During the Preparation and Implementation of Local Government Reforms in the Second Half of the 19th Century]. Penza, 2020. 162 p.
3. Shutov A.Yu. Zemskie vybory v istorii Rossii (1864–1917): issledovanie izbiratel’nykh sistem [Zemstvo Elections in the History of Russia (1864–1917): A Study of Electoral Systems]. Moscow, 1997. 212 p.
4. Conroy M.S. (ed.). Emerging Democracy in Late Imperial Russia: Case Studies on Local Self-Government (the Zemstvos), State Duma Elections, the Tsarist Government, and the State Council Before and During World War I. Niwot, 1998. 316 p.
5. Porter T.E. Prince George E. L’vov: The Zemstvo, Civil Society, and Liberalism in Late Imperial Russia. Lanham, 2017. 257 p.
6. Emmons T., Vucinich W.S. (eds.). The Zemstvo in Russia: An Experiment in Local Self-Government. Cambridge, 1982. 452 p.
7. Wcislo F.W. Reforming Rural Russia: State, Local Society, and National Politics, 1855–1914. Princeton, 1990. 347 p.
8. Sorokin A.A. Diskussii o vvedenii obrazovatel’nogo tsenza v zemskoe izbiratel’noe zakonodatel’stvo Rossiyskoy imperii v nachale XX v. [Discussions on the Introduction of an Educational Qualification in the Zemstvo Electoral Legislation of the Russian Empire at the Beginning of the Twentieth Century]. Vestnik MGPU. Ser.: Istoricheskie nauki, 2022, no. 4, pp. 78–90. https://doi.org/10.25688/20-76-9105.2022.48.4.07
9. Sorokin A.A. Diskussii o gorodskom predstavitel’stve v zemskoy izbiratel’noy sisteme v nachale XX v. (na primere Nizhegorodskoy gubernii) [Discussions About City Representation in the Zemstvo Electoral System in the Early ХХ Century (on the Example of the Nizhny Novgorod Province)]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo, 2022, no. 5, pp. 48–54. https://doi.org/10.52452/19931778_2022_5_48
10. Sorokin A.A. Ministerstvo vnutrennikh del i vopros o peresmotre zemskogo izbiratel’nogo zakonodatel’stva na rubezhe XIX–XX vv. [The Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Issue of Revising the Zemstvo Election Legislation at the Turn of the 19th Century]. Mazur L.N. (ed.). Istoriko-kul’turnoe nasledie v institutsional’nom izmerenii [Historical and Cultural Heritage in the Institutional Dimension]. Yekaterinburg, 2022, pp. 441–445.
11. Azamatova G.B. Zemskoe samoupravlenie v mnogonatsional’nom regione Rossii (na primere Ufimskoy gubernii, 1874–1917 gg.) [The Zemstvo Self-Government in Russia’s Multinational Regions (the Case of the Ufa Province, 1874–1917)]. Ufa, 2021. 362 p.
12. Subbotina A.M. Sotsial’no-demograficheskaya kharakteristika krest’yanskikh glasnykh zemskikh sobraniy 1890-kh gg. Po materialam Gosudarstvennogo arkhiva Kirovskoy oblasti [Social and Demographic Portrait of Peasant Representative in Zemstvo in 1890s: Materials from the State Archive of the Kirov Region]. Vestnik arkhivista, 2017, no. 4, pp. 183–193. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-0101-2017-4-183-193