UDC

94(73).092.9:327

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V316

Authors

Vladimir Yu. Luk’yanov
Cand. Sci. (Hist.), Assoc. Prof., Assoc. Prof. at the Department of International Entrepreneurship, Saint-Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation (address: ul. Bol’shaya Morskaya 67, St. Petersburg, 190000, Russian Federation).
e-mail: Volodya.luckyanov2017@yandex.ru, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9559-1733

Abstract

This article analyses trends in US foreign policy of the late 20th and first decades of the 21st centuries as a major factor influencing modern geopolitics. The problem is considered in the theoretical aspect and in the historical-political retrospect, from the 1990s to the present day. The subject of the analysis is the stages of the formation of the foreign policy doctrine upheld by the USA in international relations. For the 1990s, the paper studies the doctrines asserting hegemony and unipolarity as the goals of US foreign policy in the geopolitical realities that took shape after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The period of 2000s – 2010s was, according to the author, a time of transformation in US foreign policy: from the adoption after September 11, 2001 of the so-called Bush Doctrine, giving the USA rights to launch preventive strikes and make interventions against states suspected of cooperation with international terrorist organizations, to the idea of abandoning claims to global hegemony and attempts to normalize relations with Russia (“reset” policy) and China (the Group of Two) during Barack Obama’s presidency. The final part of the article examines the period of Donald Trump’s and Joe Biden’s presidencies, when the USA returned to the idea of global hegemony, based on the ideological thesis that the USA is the leader of the free world opposing the world of autocracies, whose leaders are Russia and China. According to the author, the current situation reproduces the realities of the Cold War, with the confrontation between the USA as the “defender of the free world” and the USSR as the founder of the world communism movement. The author concludes by attempting to determine the reasons for the transformations in US foreign policy of the late 20th and early 21st centuries as well as to give a forecast of its development trends.

Keywords

US foreign policy, spread of democracy, US hegemony, Russia–US relations, China–US relations, new bipolarity

References

1. Ikenberry G.J. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton, 2011. 312 p.
2. Ikenberry G.J. The End of Liberal International Order? Int. Aff., 2018, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 7–23.
3. Waltz K. Globalization and American Power. Natl. Interest, 2000, no. 59, pp. 46–56.
4. Shakleina T.A. “Dilemma Ameriki” v formirovanii sovremennogo mirovogo poryadka [“American Dilemma” in the Forging of a New World Order]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, 2019, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 36−48. https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2019.17.4.59.3
5. Deneen P.J. Why Liberalism Failed. New Haven, 2018. 225 p.
6. Levitsky S., Ziblatt D. How Democracies Die. New York, 2018. 308 p.
7. Mearsheimer J.J. The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. New Haven, 2018. 328 p.
8. Mearsheimer J.J., Walt S.M. The Case of Offshore Balancing: A Superior U.S. Grand Strategy. Foreign Aff., 2016, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 70–83.
9. Walt S.M. The Hell of Good Intentions: America’s Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of the U.S. Primacy. New York, 2018. 384 p.
10. Kupchan C. Isolationism: A History of America’s Efforts to Shield Itself from the World. New York, 2020. 446 p.
11. Ryzhov I.V., Borodina M.Yu., Baranova T.V. Amerikanskaya strategiya “dostatochnogo prisutstviya” na Blizhnem Vostoke [American Strategy of “Sufficient Presence” in the Middle East]. Vestnik MGIMO-universiteta, 2020, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 236−251. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2020-5-74-236-251
12. Luk’yanov V.Yu. Post-Soviet Space in the Context of Russia–West Relations: Problems and Prospects. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2022, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 59−69. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V164
13. Markedonov S.M., Neklyudov N.Y., Suchkov M.A. Non-Military Aspects of Political Interaction in the Caucasus: Comparative Analysis of US and Russia Approaches. Polit. Stud., 2022, no. 6, pp. 166–181 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.06.12
14. Sokolova F.Kh., Shaparov A.E. The Arctic Vector of US Foreign Policy: Dynamics of Development in the Late 20th – Early 21st Centuries. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2021, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 30−41. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V085
15. Nadtochey Yu. Prezidentstvo Dzho Baydena i transatlanticheskie otnosheniya: “novyy rassvet” ili “sumerechnaya zona”? [Joe Biden’s Presidency and Transatlantic Relations: A “New Dawn” or a “Twilight Zone”?]. Evropeyskaya bezopasnost’: sobytiya, otsenki, prognozy, 2021, no. 60, pp. 10–16.
16. Golub Yu.G., Shenin S.Yu. Donal’d Tramp i evropeyskie soyuzniki: amerikanskie eksperty o sud’be NATO [Donald Trump and European Allies: American Experts on the Future of NATO]. Sovremennaya Evropa, 2021, no. 1, pp. 5−15.
17. Kozlov V. Trajectories of the US-Chinese Decoupling in the Context of Escalating International Tensions. USA Can. Econ. Politics Cult., 2022, no. 10, pp. 72–79 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686673022100054
18. Rogov S. Inequilateral Triangle: Russia–USA–China in the New Geopolitical Environment. USA Can. Econ. Politics Cult., 2022, no. 8, pp. 6−24 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686673022080016
19. Luk’yanov V.Yu. The Failed State Problem in the Foreign Policies of Russia and the USA in the Late 20th and Early 21st Centuries. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2023, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 14−23. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V255
20. Golub Yu.G., Shenin S.Yu. Ostanovka ili tupik? Elity SShA o krizise DRSMD [Stop or Deadlock? The U.S. Elites About the INF Crisis]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2020, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 20−28. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-3-20-28
21. Klimov V.A. Faktor EvroPRO v otnosheniyakh Rossii s SShA/NATO [The European Missile Defense Factor in Russia–USA/NATO Relations]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2021, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 103−111. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-10-103-111
22. Ragimova A.F. Islamskiy faktor v mirovoy politike: otsenka sovremennykh issledovateley [The Islamic Factor in World Politics: An Assessment of Contemporary Research]. Ceteris paribus, 2016, no. 7-8, pp. 9−16.
23. Manoylo A.V. Tsvetnye revolyutsii i tekhnologii demontazha politicheskikh rezhimov [Colour Revolutions and Technologies and Dismantling of Political Regimes]. Mirovaya politika, 2015, no. 1, pp. 1−19.
24. Tsvetkova N.A. Diskurs “tsvetnykh revolyutsiy” [Discourse of “Color Revolutions”]. Postsovetskie issledovaniya, 2019, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 940−950.
25. Maksimova E.N. Predposylki “tsvetnykh revolyutsiy”: sravnitel’nyy analiz [Prerequisites for Color Revolutions: Comparative Analysis]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 12: Politicheskie nauki, 2019, no. 2, pp. 24−36.
26. Kosov A.P. Syrian Factor in Russian-US Relations (2011–2018). Vestnik RUDN. Int. Relat., 2018, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 775–789 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2018-18-4-775-789