Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University.
Series "Humanitarian and Social Sciences"
ISSN 2227-6564 e-ISSN 2687-1505 DOI:10.37482/2687-1505
Legal and postal addresses of the publisher: office 1336, 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov
Phone: (818-2) 21-61-21, ext. 18-20 ABOUT JOURNAL |
Section: Philosophy Download (pdf, 0.5MB )UDC14DOI10.37482/2687-1505-V298AuthorsEllen MartinUniversity of London; Senate House, Malet St, London, WC1E 7HU, United Kingdom; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9489-9931 e-mail: Ellenmrtn@googlemail.com AbstractThis research is relevant since it allows us to understand more deeply the specifics of contemporary European discourse about the human being, which is characterized by denaturalization and rejection of wholeness of a human subject, criticism of anthropocentrism and the tendency towards an ontological equation of the human being and material objects. The origins and causes of anti- anthropologism are associated with the crisis of European humanism and attempts to overcome this crisis through a different idea of a human being. Based on the analysis of the philosophical views of M. Heidegger, A. Kojeve, G. Bataille, L. Althusser, M. Foucault and some other thinkers, the author shows the main stages of the development of anti-anthropologism in European philosophy: anti-fundamentalism, anti-humanism, structuralist and theoretical anti-humanism, and ontological anthropology. One of the objectives of this paper is to perform a retrospective analysis of the discourse about the human being in the 20th and 21st centuries. The article considers anti-fundamentalism in the philosophy of M. Heidegger, who dissolves anthropology in ontology. The author demonstrates that in the structural anthropology of C. Lévi-Strauss the problem of unconscious processes paves the way for anti-anthropology. Attention is paid to the influence on philosophical anthropology of the philosophy of M. Foucault, whose interests lie not in the human subject, but in discourse structures. He replaces anthropology with epistemology. The article reveals the essence of the ontological turn in anthropology and discusses the key ideas of ontological anthropology and the concept of multinaturalism. It is emphasized that ontological anthropology not only raises ethical issues, but also aims to reformat our traditional understanding of the world and society. The author stresses the inadequacy of the anti-anthropological trends aimed at discovering a place of harmonious coexistence beyond humanity and postulating the idea of abandoning the traditional understanding of a human being. With the prospects of such a fundamental change, the question inevitably arises of a new axiological model of value orientations, which cannot be resolved without turning to the discourse about the human being.Keywordsanti-anthropologism, ideas of a human being, anti-fundamentalism, anti-humanism, multinaturalism, ontological anthropology, new materialism, contemporary Western philosophyReferences1. Pfuetze P.E. Self, Society, Existence: Human Nature and Dialogue in the Thought of George Herbert Mead and Martin Buber. New York, 1961. 400 p.2. Geroulanos S. An Atheism That Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought. Stanford, 2010. 448 p. 3. Heidegger M. Being and Time. Oxford, 2001. 592 p. 4. Kojeve A. Atheism. New York, 2021. 248 p. 5. Kojeve A. Introduction to the Reading of Hegel: Lectures on the Phenomenology of Spirit. London, 1980. 303 p. 6. Habermas J. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge, 1987. 225 p. 7. Bataille G. Erotism, Death and Sensuality. San Francisco, 1986. 297 p. 8. Bataille G. Eroticism. London, 2001. 320 p. 9. Bataille G. Guilty. New York, 1988. 161 p. 10. Tyson L. Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide. New York, 2006. 465 p. 11. Lévi-Strauss C. The Raw and the Cooked: Introduction to a Science of Mythology. London, 1969. 384 p. 12. Lévi-Strauss C. The Savage Mind. London, 1966. 312 p. 13. Althusser L., Balibar E. Reading Capital. London, 1970. 439 p. 14. Foucault M. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of Human Sciences. London, 2001. 448 p. 15. Foucault M. What Is Enlightenment? Rabinow P. (ed.). The Foucault Reader. New York, 1984, pp. 32-50. 16. Latour B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. London, 2005. 301 p. 17. Harman G. The Quadruple Object. Winchester, 2011. 157 p. 18. Meillassoux Q. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. London, 2009. 156 p. 19. Barad K. Posthumanist Performativity: Towards an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter Signs. J. Women Cult. Soc., 2003, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 801–831. DOI: 10.1086/345321 20. Bennett J. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, 2010. 200 p. 21. Braidotti R. The Posthuman. Cambridge, 2013. 180 p. 22. Barad K. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, 2007. 544 p. 23. Haraway D.J. Manifestly Haraway. Minneapolis, 2016. 356 p. 24. Deleuze G., Guattari F. A Thousand of Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London, 1988. 629 p. 25. DeLanda M. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London, 2006. 148 p. 26. de Castro E.V. Cannibal Metaphysics: For a Post-Structural Anthropology. Minneapolis, 2014. 234 p. 27. Haraway D. A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s. Social. Rev., 1985, no. 80, pp. 65–108. 28. Derrida J. The Ends of Man. Margins of Philosophy. Chicago, 1972, pp. 111-136. 29. Braidotti R. Posthuman Knowledge. Cambridge, 2019. 210 p. |
Make a Submission
INDEXED IN:
|