UDC

81̕ 33

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V283

Authors

Tat’yana N. Fedulenkova
Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov;
nab. Severnoy Dviny 17, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation;
Vladimir State University;
ul. Gor’kogo 87, Vladimir, 600000, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-5827

e-mail: fedulenkova@list.ru

Abstract

The book under review is of interest as it outlines the author’s approach to understanding the paradigmatic relations in terminology. The structure of the terminological field and terminological system is differentiated, which makes it possible to use them in describing the processes of transterminologization and determinologization. In addition, the reasons for restricting synonymy, homonymy and polysemy in terminology are explained. Considering the issues of hypo-hypernymic relations in the terminological system, the author argues that the genus–species and dichotomous classification relations are the optimal type of terminological relations. Variation and synonymy are defined as zones of development for terminological systems. Homonymy and paronymy are considered by the author as totally undesirable phenomena in terminology.

Keywords

terminological systems, linguistic terminology, paradigmatic relations, multinuclearity, multiparadigmality

References

1. Leychik V.M., Shelov S.D. Lingvisticheskie problemy terminologii i nauchno-tekhnicheskiy perevod: Obzornaya informatsiya [Linguistic Problems of Terminology and Scientific and Technical Translation: Review]. Pt. 2. Moscow, 1990. 78 p.
2. Tolikina E.N. Termin v literaturnom yazyke [Term in Literary Language]. Kachevskaya G.A., Gorbachevich K.S. (eds.). Normy sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo slovoupotrebleniya [Norms of Modern Russian Literary Word Usage]. Moscow, 1966, pp. 43−65.
3. Leychik V.M. Terminovedenie: Predmet, metody, struktura [Terminology: Subject, Methods, Structure]. Moscow, 2009. 256 p.
4. Shumaylova M.S. Aktual’nye problemy razvitiya i funktsionirovaniya terminologii Internet v nemetskom yazyke [Current Issues of the Development and Functioning of Internet Terminology in the German Language: Diss.]. Omsk, 2005. 193 p.
5. Leonova S.A. Semanticheskie otnosheniya antonimii v tekhnicheskoy terminologii (na primere terminopolya “avtomatizirovannyy elektroprivod”) [Semantic Antonymic Relations in Technical Terminology (Based on the Example of the Term-Field “Automatic Electric Drive”)]. Vestnik MGOU: elektronnyy zhurnal, 2013, no. 3, p. 15. DOI: 10.18384/2224-0209-2013-3-699
6. Fedotova A.K. Antonyms in Terminology (Based on the Dictionary of the Russian Language of the 21st Century Edited by G. N. Sklyarevskaya). J. Appl. Linguist. Lexicogr., 2020, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 76‒84. DOI: 10.33910/2687-02152020-2-1-76-84
7. Danilenko V.P. Russkaya terminologiya. Opyt lingvisticheskogo opisaniya [Russian Terminology: Experience of Linguistic Description]. Moscow, 1977. 246 p.
8. Tatarinov V.A. Obshchee terminovedenie [General Terminology]. Moscow, 2006. 528 p.