UDC

122:321

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V258

Authors

Ivan S. Golubev
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia;
ul. Miklukho-Maklaya 6, Mosсow, 117198, Russian Federation;
Lomonosov Moscow State University;
ul. Leninskie gory 1, GSP-1, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6939-0583 e-mail: ivan-golubev-1997@mail.ru

Abstract

This article deals with the phenomenon of the early state as a transitional societal stage between the pre-state and the developed state. Different views on the ways of transitioning to the state structure of public life in contemporary social science are analysed. The paper indicates a lack of a valid typology of forms of socio-political organization of society that is generally accepted by the majority of the scientific community. The object of this research is the phenomenon of the early state. The purpose of the article is to identify problematic theoretical and methodological aspects of using the term early state in the analysis of key strategies for understanding the origin of the state as a historically contingent form of socio-political organization. To achieve this purpose, a number of tasks are accomplished here: to consider the current state of research on the origin of the state; to identify theoretical ideas that are common to these studies; to analyse the content characteristics of the notion of the early state in the theories of leading political anthropologists and to compare their ideas about the essence of the early state. The scientific novelty of this paper lies in the problematization of the processes of politogenesis in terms of socio-philosophical consideration. This implies, first of all, a conceptual analysis of the prevailing views in contemporary science on the origin and essence of the state, which are reproduced in the studies of political anthropologists, describing the early state as a historically necessary form of socio-political organization. The author concludes that the current pluralism of approaches within social science to the analysis of the origin of the state and its relationship with the early forms of socio-political organization is mainly due to the underdeveloped criteria for distinguishing between the concepts of state and early state, which, naturally, makes it significantly harder to determine the key factors in transitioning to the state structure of society.

Keywords

origin of the state, essence of the state, early state, chiefdom, social organization, politogenesis

References

1. Grinin L.E. (ed.). Politogenez i istoricheskaya dinamika politicheskikh institutov: ot lokal’noy potestarnosti k global’noy mir-sisteme [Politogenesis and Historical Dynamics of Political Institutions: From Local Potestarity to the Global World-System]. Moscow, 2019. 608 p.
2. Grinin L.E. (ed.). Rannee gosudarstvo, ego al’ternativy i analogi [Early State, Its Alternatives and Analogues]. Volgograd, 2006. 559 p.
3. Claessen H.J.M., Skalník P. (eds.). The Early State. The Hague, 1978. 703 p.
4. Carneiro R.L. Teoriya proiskhozhdeniya gosudarstva [A Theory of the Origin of the State]. Grinin L.E. (ed.). Rannee gosudarstvo, ego al’ternativy i analogi [Early State, Its Alternatives and Analogues]. Volgograd, 2006, pp. 55–70.
5. Carneiro R.L. Was the Chiefdom a Congelation of Ideas? Soc. Evol. Hist., 2002, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 80–100.
6. Belkov P.L. Rannee gosudarstvo, predgosudarstvo, protogosudarstvo: igra v terminy? [Early State, Pre-State, Proto-State: A Game of Terms?]. Rannie formy politicheskoy organizatsii: ot pervobytnosti k gosudarstvennosti [Early Forms of Political Organization: From Primitiveness to Statehood]. Moscow, 1995, pp. 165–187.
7. Kradin N.N. Vozhdestvo: sovremennoe sostoyanie i problemy izucheniya [Chiefdom: Current State and Topics of Study]. Rannie formy politicheskoy organizatsii: ot pervobytnosti k gosudarstvennosti [Early Forms of Political Organization: From Primitiveness to Statehood]. Moscow, 1995, pp. 11–61.
8. Engels F. Proiskhozhdenie sem’i, chastnoy sobstvennosti i gosudarstva [The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State]. Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 21. Moscow, 1961, pp. 23–178.
9. Kochakova N.B. Razmyshleniya po povodu rannego gosudarstva [Reflections on the Early State]. Rannie formy politicheskoy organizatsii: ot pervobytnosti k gosudarstvennosti [Early Forms of Political Organization: From Primitiveness to Statehood]. Moscow, 1995, pp. 153–164.
10. Pertsev D.M. Formations, Chiefdom and Early State: Why “Vulgar Marxism” Does Not Explain Process of State Formation in the World Perspective. Legal Concept = Pravovaya paradigma, 2022, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 103–111 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2022.2.13
11. Fedosov A.V., Shinakov E.A. “Nachalo gosudarstva” v zapadnoevropeyskoy, amerikanskoy i otechestvennoy politicheskoy (sotsiokul’turnoy) antropologii [“The Beginning of Statehood” in Western European, American and Russian Political (Sociocultural) Anthropology]. Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2018, no. 1, pp. 136–148. DOI: 10.22281/2413-9912-2018-02-01-136-148
12. Timonin A.N. Rannee gosudarstvo: teoretiko-metodologicheskiy ocherk razvivayushchegosya ponyatiya [Early State: Theoretical and Methodological Essay on Concept of Developing]. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta, 2012, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1129–1132.
13. Davydov S.A. Chiefdom as a Concept of Sociology: The Complexity of Interpretation. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal, 2019, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 8–26 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2018.25.1.6277
14. Tsygankov V.V. Model’ politogeneza Roberta Karneyro: problemnye momenty i neobkhodimye dopolneniya [Robert Carneiro’s Model of Politogenesis: The Problem Points and Necessary Additions]. Filosofiya i obshchestvo, 2022, no. 2, pp. 5–25. DOI: 10.30884/jfio/2022.02.01