UDC

13:323.2

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V250

Authors

Il’ya E. Sapan
Lomonosov Moscow State University; Leninskie gory 1, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8300-1679 e-mail: isapan1994@gmail.com

Abstract

In this article, the author investigates two social phenomena, namely, public opinion and public space, within the framework of the systems-communicative approach. The study is relevant due to the fact that today, both in Russia and beyond, the topic of public opinion, publicity and mass beliefs has received great attention from various spheres of public life, in particular, the political sphere, which can automatically generate research interest within the academic environment. The theoretical basis for this paper is Niklas Luhmann’s general social theory. The purpose of the study is to explicate the special characteristics of public opinion as a truly unique communication space necessary for the political system to reproduce itself. The author considers the problem of the interpretation of public opinion and its characteristics as a communicative phenomenon and consistently outlines the construct of Luhmann’s theoretical positions. Recognizing the special role of the media as an actor that gives a distinct shape to public opinion, the author demonstrates that the popular view of mass media as a manipulator of mass beliefs is often exaggerated and even prescribed: being guided by the desire to create a sensation, mass media can offer or even impose an agenda, but cannot force its full acceptance. It is postulated here that not only does the news seek its reader, but the reader seeks his/her news. Based on these positions, the author concludes that, within the framework of the political system, public opinion is a communicative tool for making universally binding decisions, rather than a sum of individual views, thus demonstrating the mythological content of the concepts of democracy, elections, and popular will.

Keywords

public opinion, public space, mass media, social system, politics, manipulation, communication, N. Luhmann

References

1. Koselleck R. A Response to Comments on the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Lehmann H., Richter M. (eds.). The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts: New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte. Occasional Paper No. 15. Washington, 1996, pp. 59–70.

2. Radina N.K. Upravlenie massmediynym diskursom kak funktsiya kommunikativnogo koda vlasti [Management of Mass Media Discourse as a Function of the Communicative Code of Power]. Politicheskaya nauka, 2017, no. 2, pp. 138–156.

3. Habermas J. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Berlin, 1962. 291 p. (Russ. ed.: Khabermas Yu. Strukturnaya transformatsiya publichnoy sfery: Issledovaniya otnositel’no kategorii burzhuaznogo obshchestva. Moscow, 2016. 344 p.).

4. Salikov A.N., Zhavoronkov A.G. Transformatsiya publichnogo prostranstva v usloviyakh revolyutsii: vzglyad iz perspektivy Khanny Arendt [The Revolutionary Transformation of the Public Realm: An Arendtian Perspective]. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie, 2018, vol. 17, no 1, pp. 9–29. DOI: 10.17323/1728-192X-2018-1-9-29

5. Luhmann N. Die Realitat der Massenmedien. Wiesbaden, 2004. 220 p. (Russ. ed.: Luman N. Real’nost’ massmedia. Moscow, 2005. 256 p.).

6. Luhmann N. Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main, 2000. 444 p.

7. Luhmann N. Gesellschaftliche Komplexität und öffentliche Meinung. Luhmann N. Soziologische Aufklärung. Vol. 5. Wiesbaden, 2009, pp. 170–182.

8. Bourdieu P. Sotsiologiya politiki [Political Sociology]. Moscow, 1993. 336 p.

9. Antonovskiy A.Yu. Massmedia – transtsendental’naya illyuziya real’nosti? [Are Mass Media a Transcendental Illusion of Reality?]. Luhmann N. Real’nost’ massmedia [The Reality of the Mass Media]. Moscow, 2005, pp. 221–248.

10. Luhmann N. Politische Theorie im Wohlfahrsstaat. Munich, 1981. 158 p.

11. Zolo D. Autopoiesis: Critique of a Postmodern Paradigm. Telos, 1990, vol. 1990, no. 86, pp. 61–80. DOI: 10.3817/1290086061

12. van Dijk T.A. Discourse and Power. Houndsmills, 2008. 308 p. (Russ. ed.: van Deyk T.A. Diskurs i vlast’: Reprezentatsiya dominirovaniya v yazyke i kommunikatsii. Moscow, 2013. 344 p.).

13. Gerim G. A Critical Review of Luhmann’s Social Systems Theory’s Perspective on Mass Media and Social Media. J. Humanity Soc., 2017, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–24. DOI: 10.12658/human.society.7.14.M0218

14. Meuer B. Kritische Bemerkungen zur Systemtheorie. Das Argument, 1973, vol. 11/12, no. 83, pp. 883–908.

15. Kieserling A. Niklas Luhmann, Zweckbegriff und Systemrationalität. Türk K. (ed.). Hauptwerke der Organisationstheorie. Opladen, 2000, pp. 178–181.

16. Guibentif P. Niklas Luhmann und die Rechtssoziologie: Gespräch mit Niklas Luhmann, Bielefeld, den 7. Januar 1991. Z. Rechtssoziol., 2000, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 217–246. DOI: 10.1515/zfrs-2000-0109