UDC

[94(510).093+94(73).092.9]:327

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V221

Authors

Anna D. Verisova
The Ural State University of Railway Transport; ul. Kolmogorova 66, Yekaterinburg, 620034, Russian Federation; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5535-9315 e-mail: verisova.anya@gmail.com

Abstract

The paper analyses the Sino-American contacts of 2009–2012 on the Tibet issue, which had occupied an important place in China–US relations since the 1980s. With Barack Obama moving into the White House, the US adopted a softer policy aimed at strengthening the relations with China. However, the Tibet issue remained a source of conflict and disagreement between Beijing and Washington. US leaders believed that China was pursuing a tough policy towards the peoples of Tibet and suggested some ways to settle the issue. Beijing, in its turn, saw this as an interference in China’s internal affairs. Having examined the works of Russian and foreign researchers, the author comes to the conclusion that for the United States the issue of human rights in Tibet was not of strategic importance, but, primarily, an opportunity to discredit China on the international arena, as any decision taken by the country would be deemed insufficient. Understanding this, Beijing reacted quite sharply to Washington’s comments, closing the door to further discussion. The paper’s chronological framework spans from the beginning of Barack Obama’s (2009) to the end of Hu Jintao’s (2012) term in office. The author turns to various sources in English and Chinese, which gives the article a significant element of novelty.

Keywords

Tibet issue, Barack Obama, Hu Jintao, Dalai Lama XIV, China–US relations, China, USA

References

1. Grozin A.V. Amerikanskaya kritika situatsii v Sin’tszyane kak instrument informatsionnoy voyny SShA protiv Kitaya [US Criticism of the Situation in Xinjiang as a Tool of the American Information War Against China]. Informatsionno-politicheskiy portal postsovetskogo prostranstva “Materik”, 6 December 2019. Available at: https://materik.ru/analitika/amerikanskaya-kritika-situacii-v-sinczyane-kak-instrument-informacionnoy-voyny-ssha-protivkitaya/ (accessed: 14 October 2020).

2. Lal D. In Praise of Empires: Globalization and Order. New York, 2004. 270 p.

3. Ikenberry G.J. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton, 2012. 392 p.

4. Posen B.R. Restraint: A New Foundation for U.S. Grand Strategy. Ithaca, 2014. 256 p.

5. Mearsheimer J.J. The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. New Haven, 2018. 328 p.

6. Kuosmanen S. Human Rights and Ideology in Foreign Policy Discourse: A Case Study of U.S. State Department Human Rights Country Reports 2000–2019. Discourse Soc., 2021, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 426–442. DOI: 10.1177/0957926521992146

7. Jannuzi F. Tibet: Seeking Common Ground on the Rooftop of the World: A Trip Report from the Staff of the Foreign Relations Committee, U.S. Senate. DIANE Publishing, 2011. 26 p.

8. Worst of the Worst 2012: The World’s Most Repressive Societies. Freedom House. Available at: https://www.freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/Worst%20of%20the%20Worst%202012%20final%20report.pdf (accessed: 15 January 2021).

9. Simonenko O.A., Fomina N.I. Perspektivy resheniya Tibetskogo voprosa [The Prospects for Resolving the Tibet Question]. Uchenye zametki TOGU, 2016, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 9–15.

10. Yin J. The Clash of Rights: A Critical Analysis of News Discourse on Human Rights in the United States and China. Crit. Discourse Stud., 2007, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 75–94. DOI: 10.1080/17405900601149491