UDC

1(091):130.2

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V194

Authors

Aleksandr I. Pigalev
Volgograd State University;
prosp. Universitetskiy 100, Volgograd, 400062, Russian Federation;
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4858-8862 e-mail: pigalev@volsu.ru

Abstract

This paper aimed to analyse the meaning and contexts of the metaphor of the spectre in Jacques Derrida’s philosophy. It is emphasized that the notion of the spectre, which was previously inadmissible for philosophical thinking due to its vagueness, doubtfulness and a dash of mysticism, became popular as a metaphor owing to the widely debated “spectral turn” in philosophy. The research starts with analysing the influence of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud on Derrida’s use of the metaphor of the spectre. It is noted here that Marx viewed commodity fetishism as a variety of the so-called converted form, which in his works became the basis for interpreting the metaphor of the spectre. Freud correlated the notion of the spectre with the uncanny feeling, whereas in other respects he, like Marx, examined spectral effects in the context of systemic processes. For Derrida, who was on that point influenced by psychoanalysts Nicolas Abraham and Maria Torok, the spectre is an anticipation of the future and thus a trace of something else, of a difference in the structures that seem undifferentiated. It is neither a spiritual nor a fully embodied remainder of self-identical presence that in a way haunts, unexpectedly disappears and returns again. In contrast to Marx and Freud, who believed that spectres could be exorcized, Derrida reckoned that one cannot get rid of them. According to Derrida, man is surrounded by endlessly deferred mediations, which engender nonremovable spectral effects. The latter, being similar to the viruses that distort communication, are, nevertheless, required by the system.

Keywords

Jacques Derrida, metaphor of the spectre, fetishism, converted form, metaphysics of presence, metaphor of the virus

References

1. Buse P., Stott A. (eds.). Ghosts: Deconstruction, Psychoanalysis, History. London, 1999. 268 p.
2. Davis C. Haunted Subjects: Deconstruction, Psychoanalysis, and the Return of the Dead. New York, 2007. 181 p.
3. Pilar Blanco M. del, Peeren E. (eds.). Popular Ghosts: The Haunted Spaces in Everyday Culture. New York, 2010. 365 p.
4. Pilar Blanco M. del, Peeren E. (eds.). The Spectralities Reader: Ghosts and Haunting in Contemporary Cultural Theory. New York, 2013. 584 p.
5. Shaw K. Hauntology: The Presence of the Past in Twenty-First Century English Literature. New York, 2018. 119 p.
6. Castricano C.J. Cryptomimesis: The Gothic and Jacques Derrida’s Ghost Writing. Montreal, 2001. 165 p.
7. Sprinker M. (ed.). Ghostly Demarcations: A Symposium on Jacques Derrida’s Specters of Marx. London, 2008. 278 p.
8. Glazier J.W. Derrida and Messianic Subjectivity: A Hauntology of Revealability. J. Cult. Res., 2017, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 241–256. DOI: 10.1080/14797585.2017.1338600
9. McNeill D. Fetishism and the Theory of Value: Reassessing Marx in the 21st Century. New York, 2021. 322 p.
10. Mamardashvili M.K. Prevrashchennye formy (O neobkhodimosti irratsional’nykh vyrazheniy) [Converted Forms. On the Need for Irrational Expressions]. Mamardashvili M.K. Formy i soderzhanie myshleniya [Forms and Content of Thinking]. St. Petersburg, 2011, pp. 243–262.
11. Marx K. Kapital [Capital]. Vol. 1. Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 23. Moscow, 1960. 907 p.
12. Marx K., Engels F. Nemetskaya ideologiya [The German Ideology]. Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 3. Moscow, 1955, pp. 7–544.
13. Adorno T.W. Thesen gegen den Okkultismus. Adorno T.W. Minima Moralia: Reflexionen aus dem beschädigten Leben. Frankfurt am Main, 1951, pp. 462–474.
14. Freud S. Zhutkoe [The Uncanny]. Freud S. Sobranie sochineniy. T. 4. Psikhologicheskie sochineniya [Collected Works. Vol. 4. Works on Psychology]. Moscow, 2006, pp. 261–297.
15. Abraham N. Notes on the Phantom: A Complement to Freud’s Metapsychology. Abraham N., Torok M. The Shell and the Kernel: Renewals of Psychoanalysis. Vol. 1. Chicago, 1994, pp. 171–176.
16. Abraham N., Torok M. “The Lost Object – Me”: Notes on Endocryptic Identification. Abraham N., Torok M. The Shell and the Kernel: Renewals of Psychoanalysis. Vol. 1. Chicago, 1994, pp. 137–156.
17. Abraham N., Torok M. The Topography of Reality: Sketching a Metapsychology of Secrets. Abraham N., Torok M. The Shell and the Kernel: Renewals of Psychoanalysis. Vol. 1. Chicago, 1994, pp. 157–161.
18. Derrida J. Fors: The Anglish Words of Nicolas Abraham and Maria Torok. Abraham N., Torok M. The Wolf Man’s Magic Word: A Cryptonymy. Minneapolis, 1986, pp. XI–XLVIII.
19. Abraham N. The Phantom of Hamlet or The Sixth Act, Preceded by the Intermission of “Truth”. Abraham N., Torok M. The Shell and the Kernel: Renewals of Psychoanalysis. Vol. 1. Chicago, 1994, pp. 187–205.
20. Rashkin E. Family Secrets and the Psychoanalysis of Narrative. Princeton, 1992. 206 p.
21. Derrida J. Me – Psychoanalysis: An Introduction to the Translation of “The Shell and the Kernel” by Nicolas Abraham. Diacritics, 1979, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3–12. DOI: 10.2307/464696
22. Derrida J. Spectres de Marx: L`État de la dette, le travail du deuil et la nouvelle Internationale. Galilée. 2002. (Russ. ed. : Derrida Zh. Prizraki Marksa. Gosudarstvo dolga, rabota skorbi i novyy internatsional. Moscow, 2006. 256 p.).
23. Derrida J. Positions. Paris. 1972. 133 p. (Russ. ed.: Derrida Zh. Pozitsii. Moscow, 2007. 160 p.).
24. Brunette P., Wills D. The Spatial Arts: An Interview with Jacques Derrida. Brunette P., Wills D. Deconstruction and the Visual Arts: Art, Media, Architecture. Cambridge, 1994, pp. 9–32.