UDC

177.7:140.8

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V480

Authors

Natalia V. Utkina^1* –  Postgraduate Student, Department of Philosophy and Theory of Culture
Vyacheslav E. Voytsekhovich² –  Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Prof., Prof. at the Department of Philosophy and Theory of Culture
^{1, 2}Tver State University, Tver, Russia
¹e-mail: katana20@rambler.ru*, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4214-9848
²e-mail: Voytsekhovich.VE@tversu.ru, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8093-7121

Abstract

The article examines the understanding of love as presented by Plato, Aristotle, and Vladimir Solovyov. They viewed love as a multifaceted phenomenon connected with the development of human nature and the cultivation of virtues in a person. In the Symposium, Plato describes love as an ascending process – from physical attraction to the contemplation of absolute beauty – reflecting the gradual evolution of the human capacity to love. Aristotle, in Nicomachean Ethics, associates love with virtue as the golden mean between extremes, emphasizing its role in attaining the good through the harmony of reason and emotions. Solovyov, in his treatise The Meaning of Love, presents love as a force that overcomes egoism and brings people together in eternal all-unity, highlighting its transformative power that elevates a person beyond physical limitations and self-centredness. All three philosophers agree that love is not a static emotion but a dynamic process dependent on the development of virtues and spiritual maturity. The authors of this paper distinguish three ways in which a person can ascend the steps of love. In the first scenario, love arises by chance, and the process unfolds “blindly”. The second path involves guidance and assistance from a wise mentor. The third scenario includes a person who is ready for spiritual ascent, synthesizing the first and the second stages and progressing through the steps of perfecting love while correlating his/her ascent with the experience of others. Both the randomness of life and a conscious choice allow a person to ascend the steps of spirituality and attain true love.

Keywords

Plato, Aristotle, Vladimir Solovyov, ontology of love, philosophy of love, stages of love, criteria of love, all-unity

References

1. Vernyakova V.E. Filosofiya lyubvi Platona: voskhozhdenie k idealu i neprekhodyashchaya tsennost’ [Plato’s Philosophy of Love: Ascent to the Ideal and Enduring Value]. Vatolina Yu.V., Minin A.S. (eds.). Gumanitarnye nauki v sovremennom vuze: vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Humanities in Modern Higher Education: Past, Present, Future]. St. Petersburg, 2024. Vol. 2, pp. 197–202.
2. Podvoyskiy L.Ya. Filosofiya lyubvi i sovershenstva V.S. Solov’eva [The Philosophy of Love and Perfection of V.S. Soloviev]. Voprosy elitologii, 2020, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 45–76. https://doi.org/10.46539/elit.v1i1.3
3. Plato. Pir [Symposium]. Plato. Dialogi. Apologiya Sokrata [Dialogues. The Apology of Socrates]. Moscow, 2019, pp. 193–268.
4. Voytsekhovich V.E. Lyubov’ kak Edinoe [Love as the One]. Integral’naya filosofiya, 2012, no. 2, pp. 12–18. Available at: https://allunity.ru/journals/J2.pdf (accessed: 5 July 2025).
5. Utkina N.V. Opirayas’ na Platona v poiskakh metodov razvitiya cheloveka segodnya [Turning to Plato in Search of Methods of Human Development Today]. Filosofiya i kul’tura informatsionnogo obshchestva [Philosophy and Culture of the Information Society]. St. Petersburg, 2022, pp. 317–319.
6. Aristotle. Nikomakhova etika [Nicomachean Ethics]. Moscow, 2020. 222 p.
7. Solovyov V. Stat’ya chetvertaya [Article Four]. Solovyov V. Smysl lyubvi [The Meaning of Love]. St. Petersburg, 2016, pp. 101–121.
8. Solovyov V. Stat’ya pyataya [Article Five]. Solovyov V. Smysl lyubvi [The Meaning of Love]. St. Petersburg, 2016, pp. 121–138.
9. Hegel G.W.F. Filosofiya religii [Philosophy of Religion]. Moscow, 1975–1977. Vol. 1. 1975. 536 p.; Vol. 2. 1977. 572 p.
10. Aurobindo S. Savitri. Pondicherry, 1997. 763 p.
11. Ginzburg T.I., Shirokov G.A. Ya zdes’! [I’m Here!]. Moscow, 2018. 413 p.
12. Khan A.H. Kierkegaard’s Works of Love as Resource for Learning to Be Human: A Starting Point. Res. Eur. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., 2018, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 17–26.