Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University.
Series "Humanitarian and Social Sciences"
ISSN 2227-6564 e-ISSN 2687-1505 DOI:10.37482/2687-1505
Legal and postal addresses of the publisher: office 1336, 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov
Phone: (818-2) 21-61-21, ext. 18-20 ABOUT JOURNAL |
Section: Philosophy, Sociology, Politology Download (pdf, 4.2MB )UDC124:304+211DOI10.17238/issn2227-6564.2019.1.110AuthorsYuliya G. MatushanskayaKazan (Volga Region) Federal University; ul. Kremlevskaya 18, Kazan, 420008, Respublika Tatarstan, Russian Federation; e-mail: jgm2007@yandex.ru AbstractThis article analyses the concept of the second-order observer, which, according to Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory, includes God. At the same time, God is not a person, but some external element of the system. Luhmann’s complex theory of social systems reflects a new perspective on both society and religion. Religion generates meanings that maintain integrity of the social system, whose survival requires an external observer – an observer of observations – who is a kind of transcendence that can only be comprehended by going beyond the system’s meanings. This work aimed to determine the importance of the new approach to religion and to the concept of God presented in Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory. Previously, God had rather been a subject of metaphysical speculations than a serious topic of research in social philosophy. Greater awareness of the importance of Luhmann’s innovation can help to significantly change the approach to studying society, relationships between religion and civilization, science and religion, as well as to understanding the function of religion as a regulator of social processes. The methodological basis for this article is Nikolas Luhmann’s structural functionalism, in particular, his theory of autopoietic social systems. The author of this paper comes to the conclusion that Luhmann’s new approach to religion as an important factor of changes (self-reference) in the society leads to revision of the main ideas of religion as of something conservative and static in its essence. Being in the area of the transcendental, religion generates new meanings and promotes the evolution of the old ones, thus changing the immanent, that is, in effect, phenomenal reality. This can make a significant contribution, to the development of both social philosophy and ontological aspects of philosophical knowledge. The results of this research can be applied in teaching philosophy and religious studies.Keywordstranscendence, Niklas Luhmann, the Great Observer, second-order observer, God, systems theoryReferences1. Nazarchuk A.V. Teoretiko-politicheskie vozzreniya Niklasa Lumana [Niklas Luhmann’s Theoretical-Political Views]. Polis, 2006, no. 3, pp. 136–149.2. Poskonin V.V., Poskonina O.V. T. Parsons i N. Luman: Dva podkhoda v pravoponimanii [T. Parsons and N. Luhmann: Two Approaches in Understanding Law]. Izhevsk, 1998. 342 p. 3. Feofanov K.A. Sotsiologiya organizatsiy Niklasa Lumana: kommunikatsiya vlasti i doveriya [Niklas Luhmann’s Sociology of Organizations: Communication of Power and Trust]. Sotsis, 1999, no. 3, pp. 126–128. 4. Arinin E. Religiya kak “autopoyeticheskaya sistema” v rabotakh Niklasa Lumana [Religion as an Autopoietic System in the Works of Niklas Luhmann]. Gosudarstvo, religiya i tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2013, no. 3, pp. 130–161. 5. Golovin N.A. Sotsiologicheskaya teoriya kak chast’ sotsial’noy sistemy [Sociological Theory as Part of the Social System]. Luhmann N. Sotsial’nye sistemy [Social Systems]. St. Petersburg, 2007, pp. 5–14. 6. Nazarchuk A.V. Obshchestvo kak kommunikatsiya v trudakh Niklasa Lumana [Society as Сommunication in Niklas Luhmann’s Works]. Voprosy filosofii, 2006, no. 6, pp. 156–173. 7. Varakin V.S. “Mlechnye puti” chelovechestva: mediasreda kak galaktika sobytiy [The “Milky Ways” of Mankind: Media Environment as a Galaxy of Events]. Informatsionnoe pole sovremennoy Rossii: praktiki i effekty [Information Field of Contemporary Russia: Practices and Effects]. Kazan, 2016, pp. 151–163. 8. Valentinov V. The Ethics of Functional Differentiation: Reclaiming Morality in Niklas Luhmann’s Social Systems Theory. J. Bus. Ethics, 2017. doi :10.1007/s10551-017-3521-7. 9. Morgner G. Trust and Society: Suggestions for Further Development of Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Trust. Can. Rev. Sociol., 2018, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 232–256. 10. Koyama Y. Repeated Reinterpretation of Civil Society: On the Intellectual Context of Niklas Luhmann’s Sociological Theory. Int. J. Jpn. Sociol., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 107–119. 11. Rasch W. Niklas Luhmann. New Ger. Critique, 2017, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 189–203. 12. Simon F.C. Meta-Regulation in Practice: Beyond Normative Views of Morality and Rationality. Abingdon, 2017. 240 p. 13. Matushanskaya Yu.G. Sotsial’no-filosofskiy analiz teorii sistem Niklasa Lumana [Social-Philosophical Analysis of Niklas Luhmann’s Systems Theory]. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo energeticheskogo universiteta, 2012, no. 3, pp. 86–98. 14. Spencer-Brown G. Laws of Form. New York, 1979. 141 p. 15. Bataille G. Méthode de méditation. OEuvres complètes. V. Paris, 1973. |
Make a Submission
INDEXED IN:
|