UDC

113+141.333

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V454

Authors

Ellen Martin, PhD, Research Associate, University of Leeds (address: Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom).
e-mail: Ellenmrtn@googlemail.com, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9489-9931

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the active postulation of a posthuman perspective by theorists of transhumanism and posthumanism, blurring the boundaries between the human and the non-human worlds and simplifying philosophical reflections on the inner world of man, the anthropological ideas of Ernst Cassirer are attracting particular interest. The purpose of this study is to highlight the distinctive features of the functionalsymbolic explanation of the essence of man in Cassirer’s philosophy and explore the relevance of his philosophical and anthropological views in the context of transhumanism and posthumanism. Considering humans from the point of view of their spiritual activity, Cassirer defines man as a symbolic being due to the fact that he has a unique ability to attach symbolic meaning to his surroundings. Cassirer replaces Kant’s forms of intuition and categories of reason with symbol. According to Cassirer, the symbolic nature of consciousness creates a special human existence, dominated not by physical but by spiritual laws determining a special inner world of man, which is a distinctive anthropological characteristic. It is precisely this characteristic that the theorists of posthumanism ignore when they postulate the idea of hybridization, placing man on par with non-human creatures and even technologies. The same problem is typical of transhumanism, which overcomes the boundary between human and technology. Cassirer argues that due to the unique symbolic nature of consciousness, man lives in a symbolic universe. This means that the human world cannot be entangled with the non-human world, as theorists of posthumanism hypothesize. Cassirer’s conceptualization of man who perceives reality through symbols undermines the posthumanist ideas of radical ontological openness and hybridization as well as the transhumanist postulate, according to which technology provides the means for unbound modification of human nature with the aim of achieving a transhuman phase as a transitional stage towards posthumanity. Cassirer’s ideas reintroduce the question of the inner man into anthropological discourse.

Keywords

E. Kassirer, philosophical anthropology, symbolic nature of consciousness, inner man, transhumanism, posthumanism, posthumanity

References

1. Langer S.K. Philosophy in a New Key: A Study in Symbolism of Reason, Rite, and Art. New York, 1942. 248 p.
2. Gilbert C. Cassirer’s Placement of Art. Schilpp P.A. (ed.). The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer. Wisconsin, 1949, pp. 605–630.
3. Verene D.P. The Origins of the Philosophy of Symbolic Forms: Kant, Hegel, and Cassirer. Evanston, 2011. 168 p. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv47w6gg
4. Krois J.M. Cassirer: Symbolic Forms and History. New Haven, 1987. 290 p.
5. Luft S. The Space of Culture: Towards a Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Culture (Cohen, Natorp, and Cassirer). Oxford, 2015. 247 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198738848.001.0001
6. Luft S. Cassirer’s Philosophy of Symbolic Forms: Between Reason and Relativism. A Critical Appraisal. Ideal. Stud., 2004, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 25–47. https://doi.org/10.5840/idstudies200434113
7. Lofts S. The Subject of Culture. Krois J.M., Hamlin C. (eds.). Symbolic Forms and Cultural Studies: Ernst Cassirer’s Theory of Culture. New Haven, 2004, pp. 61–77. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300156836-009
8. Lofts S.G. Ernst Cassirer: A “Repetition” of Modernity. New York, 2000. 276 p.
9. Skidelsky E. Ernst Cassirer: The Last Philosopher of Culture. Princeton, 2008. 288 p.
10. Matherne S. Cassirer. London, 2021. 306 p.
11. Truwant S. Cassirer’s Functional Conception of the Human Being. Ideal. Stud., 2015, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 169–189. https://doi.org/10.5840/idstudies20161543
12. Svas’yan K.A. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form E. Kassirera: kriticheskiy analiz [E. Cassirer’s Philosophy of Symbolic Forms: A Critical Analysis]. Moscow, 2010. 243 p.
13. Kravchenko A.A. Logika gumanitarnykh nauk E. Kassirera. Kassirer i Gete [The Logic of the Humanities by E. Cassirer. Cassirer and Goethe]. Moscow, 1999. 333 p.
14. Soboleva M.E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form E. Kassirera: Genezis. Osnovnye ponyatiya. Kontekst [E. Cassirer’s Philosophy of Symbolic Forms: Genesis. Key Concepts. Context]. St. Petersburg, 2001. 151 p.
15. Smirnov S.A. Antropologiya kak strogaya nauka? K voprosu o metodologicheskom obosnovanii filosofskoy antropologii. St. 3. Ernst Kassirer. Chelovek v ob”yatiyakh kul’tury [Anthropology as a Strict Science? To the Question of the Methodological Substantiation of Philosophical Anthropology. Article 3. Ernst Cassirer. Man in the Arms of Culture]. Filosofskaya antropologiya, 2022, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 17–34. https://doi.org/10.21146/2414-3715-2022-8-2-17-34
16. Zaner R.M. An Approach to Philosophical Anthropology. Philos. Phenomenol. Res., 1966, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 55–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/2106138
17. Bengtson E., Rosengren M. A Philosophical-Anthropological Case for Cassirer in Rhetoric. Rhetorica, 2017, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 346–365. https://doi.org/10.1353/rht.2017.0010
18. Demidova M.V. Teoriya cheloveka E. Kassirera [E. Cassirer’s Theory of Man]. Vlast’, 2007, no. 1, pp. 88–91.
19. Recki B. Cassirer and the Problem of Language. Bishop P., Stephenson R.H. (eds.). Cultural Studies and the Symbolic. London, 2003, pp. 1–20.
20. Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma [The Critique of Pure Reason]. Moscow, 2017. 560 p.
21. Losev A.F. Dialektika mifa [The Dialectics of Myth]. Moscow, 2021. 448 p.
22. Obolevitch T. Symbol in Ernst Cassirer’s and Aleksei Losev’s Thought. Bychkov O., Stahl H., Takho-Godi E. (eds.). Cultures, Epochs, Ideas, Styles. New York, 2023, pp. 425–434.
23. Braidotti R. Posthuman Knowledge. Cambridge, 2019. 210 p.
24. Zabulionite A.-K.I. Transtsendental’noe istolkovanie tipologizatsii v “Filosofii simvolicheskikh form” E. Kassirera [Transcendental Interpretation of Typology in “Philosophy of the Symbol’s Forms” by E. Kassirer]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 6: Filosofiya, kul’turologiya, politologiya, pravo, mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2008, no. 4, pp. 277–288.
25. Barad K. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Åsberg C., Braidotti R. (eds.). A Feminist Companion to the Posthumanities. Cham, 2018, pp. 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62140-1_19
26. Bennett J. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, 2010. 200 p. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv111jh6w