UDC

[81ʼ42+811.111]:378

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V451

Authors

Sergey G. Nikolaev, Dr. Sci. (Philol.), Prof., Head of the English Philology Department, Southern Federal University (address: per. Universitetskiy 93, Rostov-on-Don, 344006, Russia).
e-mail: nikolaev_s@bk.ru*, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6896-5034

Marina A. Sukhomlinova, Dr. Sci. (Philol.), Assoc. Prof., Assoc. Prof. at the English Philology Department, Southern Federal University (address: per. Universitetskiy 93, Rostov-on-Don, 344006, Russia).
e-mail: marinasuhomlinova74@gmail.com, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4092-1480

Abstract

This article presents an integrative linguistic analysis of the annual English-language address of a university vice-chancellor to the academic community. The research was performed within the framework of contemporary discourse theory and views the vice-chancellor’s address as an established traditional oral speech genre. The paper raises the questions of qualifying and balancing the notions of oral communication, text, discourse, and genre; each of these is interpreted in a symbiotic connection with the determining adjective ‘academic’. The structural and compositional features of the vice-chancellor’s address include the subdivision of the speech into four logically arranged parts: pre-text, introduction, main body, and conclusion. The syntactic features manifest themselves as means and devices of information packaging that express the semantic categories of prospection and retrospection. In addition, we can observe cases of intentional use of logical connectives, rhetorical questions, inversion, and variable syntactic parallelism. Special communicative functions are performed by the following lexicosemantic features of the genre under discussion: repetition (reiteration of both words and senses); words and phrases expressing quantity, numerical data included; toponyms; abbreviations; terms of science; quotes; words representing key concepts of the speech; and a separate group of lexical units. The latter, through their semantic features, serve to create and promote a positive image of the institution (its history and prestige, international activities, quality of education, mission, prospects for development, etc.). The preparation and delivery of the vice-chancellor’s address as an oral genre in the English-language academic communication is primarily based on the speaker’s idea of challenges faced by the university and the most effective ways of responding to them.

Keywords

English-language academic discourse, oral speech genre, communicative event, public speech, annual vice-chancellor’s address, structural and compositional features, syntactic features, lexical and semantic features

References

1. Shannon C.E. Raboty po teorii informatsii i kibernetike [Works on the Theory of Information and Cybernetics]. Moscow, 1963. 829 p.
2. Mirskiy E.M., Barbot’ko M.M., Voytov V.A. Nauchnaya kommunikatsiya: traditsionnye struktury i novye sredstva [Scientific Communication: Traditional Structures and New Means]. Trudy Instituta sistemnogo analiza Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 2010, vol. 55, pp. 155–171.
3. Levchenko V.V., Agrikova E.V., Voronina M.A. Development of Academic Communication Skills: Methods of Work Organization. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2017, no. 4, pp. 58–62 (in Russ.).
4. Kulikova L.V. Kommunikativnyy stil’ v mezhkul’turnoy paradigme [Communicative Style in the Cross-Cultural Paradigm]. Krasnoyarsk, 2006. 392 p.
5. Kungurtseva T.S., Lanskikh A.V. Osobennosti zhanra pechatnogo obrashcheniya (na materiale obrashcheniya rektora UrFU k studentam) [Genre Features of a Printed Address (Based on the Address of Vice-Chancellor of the Ural Federal University to Students]. Knizhnoe delo: dostizheniya, problemy, perspektivy [Publication: Achievements, Problems, Prospects]. Yekaterinburg, 2015, no. 5, pp. 54–58.
6. Kozlov V.I. (ed.). Zhanr kak instrument prochteniya [Genre as a Tool for Interpretation]. Rostov-on-Don, 2012. 234 p.
7. Kolmogorova A.V., Kozachina A.V. Speech Genre in Discourse Dynamics. Terra Linguist., 2023, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 79–94 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18721/JHSS.14406
8. Vakhterova E.V. Genre-Specific Characteristics of the English Research Article: Analysis of the Content Macrostructure of the Results and Discussion Sections. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2022, no. 2, pp. 78–86. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V168
9. Borisova I.N. Russkiy razgovornyy dialog: struktura i dinamika [Russian Spoken Dialogue: Structure and Dynamics]. Yekaterinburg, 2001. 405 p.
10. Makarov M.L. Osnovy teorii diskursa [Fundamentals of Discourse Theory]. Moscow, 2003. 280 p.
11. Obdalova O.A., Kharapudchenko O.V. Kognitivno-pragmaticheskie i lingvostilisticheskie kharakteristiki angloyazychnogo ustnogo nauchno-akademicheskogo diskursa [Cognitive Pragmatic and Linguistic Characteristics of English Scientific Academic Discourse]. Yazyk i kul’tura, 2019, no. 46, pp. 102–125.
12. Alefirenko N.F. Rechevoy zhanr, diskurs i kul’tura [Speech Genre. Discourse and Culture]. Dement’ev V.V. (ed.). Zhanry rechi. Vyp. 5. Zhanr i kul’tura [Speech Genres. Iss. 5. Genre and Culture]. Saratov, 2007, pp. 44–55.
13. Dement’ev V.V. Aspekty problemy “zhanr i yazyk”: zhanry rechi i... “yazyk rechi”? [Aspects of the “Genre and Language” Problem: Genres of Speech and... “Language of Speech”?]. Dement’ev V.V. (ed.). Zhanry rechi. Vyp. 6. Zhanr i yazyk [Speech Genres. Iss. 6. Genre and Language]. Saratov, 2009, pp. 5–22.
14. Sukhomlinova M.A. Diskursivnye zhanry akademicheskoy kommunikatsii: lingvostilisticheskiy aspekt [Discursive Genres of Academic Communication: A Linguostylistic Aspect: Diss.]. Rostov-on-Don, 2024. 600 p.
15. Pokrovskaya E.A., Dudkina N.V., Kudinov E.V. Rechevye zhanry v dialoge kul’tur [Speech Genres in the Dialogue of Cultures]. Rostov-on-Don, 2011. 200 p.
16. Nikolaev S.G. Fenomenologiya bilingvizma v tvorchestve russkikh poetov. Ch. II. Ontologicheskie, korrelyatsionnye i funktsional’nye kharakteristiki inoyazychiya v poezii [Phenomenology of Bilingualism in the Works of Russian Poets. Pt. II. Ontological, Correlational and Functional Characteristics of Foreign Language in Poetry]. Rostov-on-Don, 2005. 295 p.
17. Shcharenskaya N.M. Osobennosti vydvizheniya v khudozhestvennom tvorchestve A.P. Chekhova (k postanovke problemy) [Characteristic Traits of Foregrounding in A.P. Chekhov’s Creative Work (Formulating the Problem)]. Nauchnaya mysl’ Kavkaza, 2023, no. 3, pp. 89–97.
18. Zubkova O.S., Nikitichev I.G. Persuasion as a Strategy of Speech Influence in Bilingual Academic Discourse. Terra Linguist., 2023, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 52–66 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18721/JHSS.14404
19. McCarthy M. Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge, 1991. 224 p.
20. Ivanova S.V. News as a Genre of Discourse: a Non-Missing Structure. Terra Linguist., 2022, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 7–14 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18721/JHSS.13301