UDC

94(73).092:351.746.1

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V447

Authors

Vladimir Yu. Luk’yanov, Cand. Sci. (Hist.), Assoc. Prof., Assoc. Prof. at the Department of International Entrepreneurship, Saint-Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation (address: ul. Bol’shaya Morskaya 67, St. Petersburg, 190000, Russia).
e-mail: Volodya.luckyanov2017@yandex.ru, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9559-1733

Abstract

The article analyses the importance of the ideological factor in the shaping of US foreign policy in the late 20th and early decades of the 21st centuries. The role of ideology in US foreign policy is outlined in historical retrospect. It is pointed out that after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the USA faced the problem of finding a new ideological doctrine that would replace the anti-Communist doctrine of the Cold War era. The key aim was to substantiate the country’s claims to geopolitical dominance and the creation of a unipolar world, which took shape as early as in the 1990s. During that period, the ideological basis of US foreign policy were the concept of democratic enlargement by A. Lake and, for the post-Soviet states, the concept of geopolitical pluralism by Z. Brzeziński. In the early 21st century, democratic enlargement was supplemented by the concepts of humanitarian intervention and regime change, whose purpose was to ideologically substantiate the policy of largescale military interventions that were launched in the late 1990s – early 2000s. The author analyses the attempts of the US leadership to deviate from the so-called reset policy by Barack Obama, as well as the announced abandonment of the policy of interventions in the course of Donald Trump’s first presidential term. In addition, the role of ideology in the country’s foreign policy during Joe Biden’s presidency is studied. The author comes to the conclusion that the current US foreign policy is extremely ideologized. The steps taken by the US leadership in the sphere of foreign policy are rather based on ideological stereotypes than on the analysis of the actual state of affairs on the global stage. According to the author, the dominant ideology makes the stabilization of the system of international relations impossible. In conclusion, the author attempts to determine prospects for US foreign policy taking into account a major recent event, i.e. D. Trump’s victory in the US presidential election.

Keywords

US foreign policy, UN, international law, democratic enlargement, geopolitical pluralism, humanitarian intervention, regime change

References

1. Ikenberry G.J. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton, 2011. 312 p. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7rjt2
2. Ikenberry G.J. The End of Liberal International Order? Int. Aff., 2018, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix241
3. Waltz K. Globalization and American Power. Natl. Interest, 2000, no. 59, pp. 46–56.
4. Deenen P.J. Why Liberalism Failed. New Haven, 2018. 225 p. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300223446.001.0001
5. Levitsky S., Ziblatt D. How Democracies Die. New York, 2018. 308 p.
6. Mearsheimer J.J. The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. New Haven, 2018. 328 p. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv5cgb1w
7. Mearsheimer J.J. Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order. Int. Secur., 2019, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 7–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00342
8. Walt S.M. The Hell of Good Intentions: America’s Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of the U.S. Primacy. New York, 2018. 384 p.
9. Kupchan C.A. No One’s World: The West, The Rising Rest, and the Coming Global Turn. New York, 2012. 272 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199739394.001.0001
10. Kissinger H. Does America Need a Foreign Policy? Toward a Diplomacy for the 21st Century. New York, 2001. 318 p.
11. Shakleina T.A. Perelomnyy moment v mirovom razvitii. Sokhranit li Zapad preobladayushchee vliyanie na formirovanie mirovogo poryadka v XXI veke? [Turning Point in Global Development. Will the West Keep Its Predominant Influence on World Order in the 21st Century?]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, 2022, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 6–22. https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2022.20.4.71.2
12. Shakleina T.A. “Dilemma Ameriki” v formirovanii sovremennogo mirovogo poryadka [“American Dilemma” in the Forging of a New World Order]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, 2019, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 36−48. https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2019.17.4.59.3
13. Konkova D.A. Isolationism as the United States’ Grand Strategy: From the Founding Fathers to Donald Trump. Vestn. St. Petersb. Univ. Int. Relat., 2024, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 43–58 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2024.103
14. Tsygankov A.P. Gulliver at the Crossroads: America’s Strategy During the Global Transition. J. Int. Anal., 2020, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 28–44 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2020-11-2-28-44
15. Kolobov O.A., Tumina Yu.V. Doktrinal’nye osnovy vneshney politiki SShA pri administratsiyakh Dzh. Busha-ml. i B. Obamy [Doctrinal Basis of US Foreign Policy During the Presidency of George W. Bush and Barack Obama]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo, 2012, no. 1, pp. 277–284.
16. Tret’yakov D.T. Analiz doktriny Busha-mladshego s tochki zreniya teorii gegemonistskoy stabil’nosti v amerikanskom ekspertnom soobshchestve [Analysis of the Doctrine of George W. Bush from the Point of View of the Hegemony Stability Theory]. Klio, 2024, no. 2, pp. 61–71.
17. Sidorov A.Yu., Fradkova V.I. Doktrina “smeny rezhimov” v amerikanskoy vneshnepoliticheskoy traditsii i ideologii [The Doctrine of “Regime Change” in American Foreign Policy Tradition and Ideology]. Obozrevatel’-Observer, 2023, no. 1, pp. 17–29. https://doi.org/10.48137/2074-2975_2023_1_17
18. Lukin A.V. Novaya mezhdunarodnaya ideokratiya i Rossiya [New International Ideocracy and Russia]. Sravnitel’naya politika, 2016, no. 1, pp. 41–57. https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2016-7-1 (22)-41-57
19. Shakleina T.A., Batalov E.Ya., Bolgova I.A., Bezrukov A.O., Vakulova T.V., Istomin I.A., Mamedli R.T., Smirnov A.I., Suchkov M.A., Sushentsov A.A., Tomberg I.R., Fenenko A.V., Khodynskaya-Golenishcheva M.S., Khudaykulova A.V., Yamburenko E.N. Rossiya i SShA v XXI veke. Osobennosti [Russia and the USA in the 21st Century. Specific Features]. Moscow, 2020. 352 p.
20. Pechatnov V.O., Manykin A.S. Istoriya vneshney politiki SShA [The History of US Foreign Policy]. Moscow, 2024. 680 p.
21. Sogrin V.V. Liberalizm. Demokratiya. Imperiya [Liberalism. Democracy. Empire]. Moscow, 2015. 592 p.
22. Bubnova N.I. Voenno-politicheskiy kurs SShA vo vtorom desyatiletii 21 veka [The US Military-Political Course in the Second Decade of the 21st Century]. Moscow, 2021. 647 p.
23. Vasil’ev V.S. Evolyutsiya kontseptsii amerikanskoy isklyuchitel’nosti i rol’ SShA v mirovom poryadke [Evolution of the Concept of American Exceptionalism and the US Role in the World Order]. Perspektivy. Elektronnyy zhurnal, 2016, no. 4, pp. 56–70.
24. Fukuyama F. Konets istorii i posledniy chelovek [The End of History and the Last Man]. Moscow, 2004. 588 p.
25. Fukuyama F. State Building: Governance and World Order in the Twenty-First Century. London, 2004. 194 p. (Russ. ed.: Fukuyama F. Sil’noe gosudarstvo: Upravlenie i mirovoy poryadok v XXI veke. Moscow, 2006. 220 p.).
26. Nye J.S. Jr. Soft Power. Foreign Policy, 1990, no. 80, pp. 153–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/1148580
27. Nye J.S. Jr. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York, 2004. 191 p.
28. Keohane R. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, 1984. 320 p.
29. Brzeziński Z. The Premature Partnership. Foreign Aff., 1994, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 67–82.
30. Mitchell L.A. The Color Revolutions. Philadelphia, 2012. 256 p.
31. Haas R., Kupchan C.A. The New Concert of Powers: How to Prevent Catastrophe and Promote Stability in a Multipolar World. Available at: https://katehon.com/ru/article/novyy-koncert-derzhav (accessed: 9 June 2024) (in Russ.).