UDC

81’25

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V486

Authors

Konstantin K. Rodionov^1* - Lecturer at the English (as a Second Language) Department, Prince Alexander Nevsky Military University (address: ul. Volochaevskaya 3/4, str. 12, Moscow, 111033, Russia).

¹e-mail: hfguyvg@mail.ru*, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7674-1688

Dmitry V. Balaganov² - Dr. Sci. (Philol.), Head of the English (as a Second Language) Department, Prince Alexander Nevsky Military University (address: ul. Volochaevskaya 3/4, str. 12, Moscow, 111033, Russia).

²e-mail: dmitryrus@yandex.ru, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6021-0323

Abstract

The article explores linguocultural decoding and encoding in simultaneous interpretation, aimed at ensuring effective intercultural communication. The authors analyse the theoretical aspects of these processes, emphasizing their close connection with the linguistic worldview and cultural contexts. Special attention is paid to the cognitive mechanisms inherent in simultaneous interpretation, including simultaneous perception, analysis and reproduction of speech, as well as their impact on the emotional and psychological strain experienced by interpreters. The primary focus of the study is on identifying key challenges faced by simultaneous interpreters. These include overcoming linguocultural differences, handling highly specialized terms, making decisions under time constraints and coping with stress. The authors highlight that successful transmission of cultural meanings requires not only linguistic competence but also a deep understanding of the historical, social and emotional dimensions of both cultures involved. Practical recommendations for optimizing linguocultural decoding and encoding are proposed. These include developing active listening skills and improving linguistic and cultural competence in the context of interpreting contemporary public speaking discourse. Particular emphasis is placed on incorporating cultural context analysis into educational programmes to prepare specialists for effective work in intercultural communication environments. The study confirms that considering linguocultural aspects and cognitive mechanisms of simultaneous interpretation is a critical factor in improving translation quality. The findings can be applied to develop new approaches in training simultaneous interpreters and to optimize their professional activities in the context of globalization. The article is intended for educators, students, practicing interpreters, and specialists in international cooperation.

Keywords

simultaneous interpretation, linguocultural decoding, linguocultural encoding, linguistic worldview, intercultural communication, cultural concepts

References

1. Rykova P.A. Funktsionirovanie kognitivnykh mekhanizmov mezhkul’turnoy kommunikatsii v sinkhronnom perevode (na materiale anglo-russkogo perevoda) [Functioning of Cognitive Mechanisms of Cross-Cultural Communication in Simultaneous Translation (by the Material of English-Russian Translation)]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2022, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 3375–3381. https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20220516
2. Wawire B.A., Zuilkowski S.S. The Role of Vocabulary and Decoding Language Skills in Reading Comprehension: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Int. Multiling. Res. J., 2021, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2020.1753953
3. Elmer S., Giroud N. Simultaneous Interpreting, Brain Aging, and Cognition: A Review and Future Directions. Transl. Cogn. Behav., 2023, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 118–140. https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00082.elm
4. Balaganov D.V. Dinamika kognitivnykh mekhanizmov v sinkhronnom perevode [Cognitive Mechanisms Dynamics in Simultaneous Interpretation: Diss.]. Moscow, 2021. 366 p.
5. Gile D. Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training. Amsterdam, 1995. 274 p.
6. Frauenfelder U.H., Schriefers H. A Psycholinguistic Perspective on Simultaneous Interpretation. Interpreting, 1997, vol. 2, no. 1-2, pp. 55–89. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.2.1-2.03fra
7. Balaganov D.V. Vliyanie stressa na deyatel’nost’ perevodchika-sinkhronista [Stress Influence on a Simultaneous Interpreter’s Activity]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2018, no. 12-1, pp. 74–79. https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2018-12-1.15
8. Chernov G.V. Teoriya i praktika sinkhronnogo perevoda [Theory and Practice of Simultaneous Interpretation]. Moscow, 1978. 208 p.
9. Min’yar-Beloruchev R.K. Kak stat’ perevodchikom? [How to Become an Interpreter]. Moscow, 1999. 176 p.
10. Rozenkova Kh.E., Shustova S.V. Lingvokul’turnyy kod: opredelenie, problema klassifikatsii, rol’ v mezhkul’turnoy kommunikatsii [Linguocultural Code: Definition, Problem of Classification, Role in Intercultural Communication]. Evraziyskiy gumanitarnyy zhurnal, 2017, no. 2, pp. 101–104.
11. Efimenko T.N. Vzaimodeystvie lingvokul’turnykh kodov v protsesse mezhkul’turnoy kommunikatsii [Interaction of Linguocultural Codes in Intercultural Communication]. Izvestiya vuzov. Ser.: Gumanitarnye nauki, 2012, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 188–191.
12. Krasnykh V.V. Kody i etalony kul’tury (priglashenie k razgovoru) [Cultural Codes and Standards (an Invitation to Discussion)]. Krasnykh V.V., Izotov A.I. (ed.). Yazyk, soznanie, kommunikatsiya [Language, Consciousness, Communication]. Moscow, 2001. Iss. 19, pp. 5–19.
13. Yusupova D.B. Substitutsiya kak priem frazeologicheskoy modifikatsii v zagolovkakh sovremennykh SMI: na materiale russkogo i angliyskogo yazykov [Substitution as a Technique of Phraseological Modification in Modern Media Headlines (Based on the Russian and English Languages): Diss.]. Moscow, 2024. 233 p.