UDC

811.111:81’373

DOI

10.37482/2687-1505-V349

Authors

Lyudmila V. Laenko

Dr. Sci. (Philol.), Prof. at the Department of English Philology, Voronezh State University (address: Universitetskaya pl. 1, Voronezh, 394018, Russia).

e-mail: lvlaenko@mail.ru, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0298-5681


Vera V. Piglovskaya

Cand. Sci. (Philol.), Assoc. Prof. at the Department of English Philology, Voronezh State University (address: Universitetskaya pl. 1, Voronezh, 394018, Russia).

e-mail: verashycheva@mail.ru*, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2937-1174

Abstract

Based on the linguocognitive approach, the article studies the linguistic conceptualization of elevations of land in English. The material was obtained from authoritative English-English dictionaries and the British National Corpus. The aim was to identify peculiarities of linguistic conceptualization of the terrain by means of landscape words forming a lexico-semantic group and denoting an elevation of land. The author performed an etymological and component analysis of the meanings of elements of the lexico-semantic group using dictionary definitions of its lexical constituents, followed by a cognitive interpretation of the semantic components of the latter and a determination of the constitutive cognitive features of the images of the designated objects. It is concluded
that the landscape nouns under study have two-dimensional meaning, which is determined by visual perception: the cognitive content of English nouns denoting an elevation of land represents not only structural knowledge – a form of categorization of information that is a given, existing knowledge representing the experience of all generations – but also phenomenological knowledge arising from sensory (immediate) observation. In addition, the author determined the ability of some of the sensually perceived features of landscape objects in the vertical space (shape, size) to serve as a cognitive basis for metaphorical images, which indicates that such features are of particular importance for the everyday life of British people. The results of this study have theoretical significance and contribute to further development of cognitive linguistics by revealing the cognitive mechanisms of perception, categorization and conceptualization of elevations of land.

Keywords

lexico-semantic group, landscape vocabulary, landscape noun, English landscape space, structural knowledge, phenomenological knowledge

References

1. Nikolova A. Kategoriya prostranstva, ee yazykovaya reprezentatsiya i lingvisticheskoe opisanie [The Category of Space, Its Linguistic Representation and Description]. Problemy kognitivnogo i funktsional’nogo opisaniya russkogo i bolgarskogo yazykov [Cognitive and Functional Description of the Russian and Bulgarian Languages]. Shumen, 2002, pp. 59–92.
2. Korneva V.V. Narechiya i parametry prostranstvennoy kartiny mira [Adverbs and the Parameters of Spatial Worldview]. Voronezh, 2008. 300 p.
3. Korneva V.V. Landshaftnaya leksika v yazykovom soznanii etnosa (po dannym assotsiativnogo slovarya) [Landscape Words in Ethnic Language Consciousness (Associative Dictionary Data)]. Vestnik VGU. Ser.: Lingvistika i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya, 2006, no. 1, pp. 16–23.
4. Gorozhankina E.M. Yazykovaya kontseptualizatsiya vertikal’nogo prostranstva (na materiale angliyskogo i russkogo yazykov) [Linguistic Conceptualization of Vertical Space (Based on the English and Russian Languages): Diss.]. Kemerovo, 2003. 171 p.
5. Kol’tsova O.V. Lingvokognitivnyy analiz leksiko-semanticheskikh grupp (na materiale LSG “vozvyshennosti” v russkom i nemetskom yazykakh) [Linguocognitive Analysis of Lexico-Semantic Groups (Based on the Lexico-Semantic Group “Elevation” in Russian and German): Diss.]. Saratov, 2011. 266 p.
6. Skrynnikova I.V. Verbalizatsiya kontsepta “Prostranstvennaya lokalizatsiya” v angloyazychnoy lingvokul’ture [Verbalization of the Concept of Spatial Localization in the English-Language Linguoculture: Diss.]. Volgograd, 2004. 174 p.
7. Kur’yanova L.A. Izmeneniya v sostave i distributsii leksem ponyatiynogo polya “vozvyshennost’” ot starofrantsuzskogo k sovremennomu yazyku [Changes in the Composition and Distribution of Lexemes of the Conceptual Field “Elevation” from Old French to Modern Language]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 2: Istoriya, yazykoznanie, literaturovedenie, 2002, no. 4, pp. 51–59.
8. Rakitina O.N. Natsional’no-kul’turnaya konnotatsiya kak semanticheskaya kategoriya (na materiale russkikh i nemetskikh slov, oboznachayushchikh uchastki rel’efa v fol’klornykh tekstakh) [National Cultural Connotation as a Semantic Category (Based on Russian and German Words Denoting Parts of the Terrain in Folklore Texts): Diss.]. Voronezh, 2005. 229 p.
9. Ol’khovikova Yu.A. Metafory so sferoy-istochnikom “Nezhivaya priroda” v politicheskom diskurse SShA i FRG [Metaphors with the Source Domain “Inanimate Nature” in the Political Discourse of the USA and Germany: Diss.]. Yekaterinburg, 2009. 211 p.
10. Seliverstova O.N. Komponentnyy analiz mnogoznachnykh slov: Na materiale nekotorykh russkikh glagolov [Component Analysis of Polysemic Words: Based on Some Russian Verbs]. Moscow, 1975. 240 p.
11. Gol’dberg V.B. Strukturnye svyazi v leksiko-semanticheskoy sisteme yazyka: Na materiale russkogo i angliyskogo leksiko-frazeologicheskikh poley “Biologicheskoe sushchestvovanie cheloveka” [Structural Connections in the Lexico-Semantic System of a Language: Based on the Russian and English Lexical-Phraseological Fields “Human Biological Existence”: Diss.]. Voronezh, 2000. 380 p.
12. Laenko L.V. Kontseptual’nye osnovy prilagatel’nykh s semantikoy soprotivleniya [Conceptual Foundations of Adjectives with the Meaning of Resistance]. Romanova T.V. (ed.). Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. Vyp. XXXVII. Integrativnye protsessy v kognitivnoy lingvistike [Cognitive Linguistic Research. Iss. 37. Integrative Processes in Cognitive Linguistics]. Nizhny Novgorod, 2019, pp. 231–235.
13. van Dijk T.A. Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London, 1977. 261 p.
14. Kubryakova E.S. Yazyk i znanie: Na puti polucheniya znaniy o yazyke: Chasti rechi s kognitivnoy tochki zreniya. Rol’ yazyka v poznanii mira [Language and Knowledge: Towards Knowledge About Language: Parts of Speech from a Cognitive Point of View. The Role of Language in World Cognition]. Moscow, 2004. 560 p.
15. Boldyrev N.N. Yazyk i sistema znaniy. Kognitivnaya teoriya yazyka [Language and Knowledge System. A Cognitive Theory of Language]. Moscow, 2018. 480 p.
16. Boldyrev N.N. Gl. I. Kontseptual’naya osnova yazyka [Ch. 1. The Conceptual Foundation of Language]. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. Vyp. IV. Kontseptualizatsiya mira v yazyke [Cognitive Linguistic Research. Iss. 4. Conceptualization of the World in Language]. Moscow, 2009, pp. 25–77.
17. Boldyrev N.N. Kategorial’naya sistema yazyka [The Categorial System of Language]. Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. Vyp. X. Kategorizatsiya mira v yazyke [Cognitive Linguistic Research. Iss. 10. Categorization of the World in Language]. Moscow, 2012, pp. 17–120.
18. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, 1980. 242 p. (Russ. ed.: Lakoff Dzh., Dzhonson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem. Moscow, 2004. 256 p.).