CC..png

16plus.png

Юридический и почтовый адрес учредителя и издателя: САФУ им. М.В. Ломоносова, наб. Северной Двины, д. 17, г. Архангельск, Россия, 163002
Адрес редакции: «Вестник САФУ. Серия "Гуманитарные и социальные науки"», ул. Урицкого, 56, г. Архангельск

Тел: (818-2) 21-61-00, вн. 18-20 
Сайт: https://vestnikgum.ru
e-mail: vestnik_gum@narfu.ru              

о журнале

Using electronic application for monitoring animals in protected areas on the example survey 123. P. 1–7

Версия для печати

Section: Biology

Download (pdf, 1.5MB )

UDC

595.799:574.32 (98)

DOI

10.17238/issn2227-6572.2021.21.1.1

Authors

NR Pirtskhalava-Karpova1,2, AA Karpov1, DA Barashnin1,3
1 Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov (Arkhangelsk, Russia)
Kurilskiy Nature Reserve (Sakhalin region, Russia)
Russian Arctic National Park (Arkhangelsk, Russia)
Corresponding author: Nana R. Pirtskhalava-Karpova (heynanabl@gmail.com)

Abstract

Monitoring of the animal world is an important component in the development of world science. Observations of animals in specially protected nature areas are conducted year-round. The goal of the study was to develop electronic data collection forms for Survey123 used for ArcGIS application and to collect field data using this application tested during the field seasons 2018–2019 in the National Park Russian Arctic. Monitoring of the number of Arctic animals (white bears, walruses, seals, etc.) was carried out from the marine vessel and along the walking routes during the polar day by the state inspectors of the Russian Arctic National Park. The results of the application testing were the animal counting field data in electronic format taken during one flight of the 50 Years of Victory icebreaker, on the vessel “Altai” and during three flights of the Sea Spirit vessel. The total number of mammals obtained using the application during the 2018–2019 field seasons was 3,452 individuals, and the total number of birds was 14,457. All animal encounters are referenced by coordinates and presented on the electronic map. The Survey123 application testing during the 2018–2019 field seasons showed the efficiency of collecting animal data in electronic format which makes the data immediately available for processing and analysis. At the end of the field seasons, it was concluded that the electronic application can completely replace the hand-written register of animals.

Keywords

animal monitoring, animal counting, biomonitoring, specially protected nature areas, Survey123

References

  1. Belikov SE, Gorbunov YuAShil’nikov VI (1984) Distribution and Migrations of Some Pinnipeds, Cetaceans, and White Bears in the Seas of the Eastern Arctic Region. Morskie mlekopitayushchie, 233–252. [In Russian]
  2. Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2001) Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Oxford University Press, 432 pp.
  3. Chelintsev NG, Goryaev YuI, Ezhov AV, Makarevich PR, Ishkulov DG (2017) Experience in estimating the number of seals by ship transect accounting using sector extrapolation based on observations in the southwestern part of the Kara Sea in the summer of 2015 [Opyt otsenki chislennosti tyuleney metodom sudovogo transektnogo uchota s primeneniyem sektornoy ekstrapolyatsii po rezul’tatam nablyudeniy v yugozapadnoy chasti Karskogo morya v letniy period 2015]. Vodnyye biologicheskiye resursy. Trudy VNIRO 168: 117–124. [In Russian]
  4. Chesmore ED (2001) Application of Time Domain Signal Coding and Artificial Neural Networks to Passive Acoustical Identification of Animals. Applied Acoustics 62(12): 1359–1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(01)00009-3
  5. Formozov AN (1951) Quantitative method in zoogeography of terrestrial vertebrate species and transformational changes of the USSR nature Kolichestvennyi metod v zoogeografii nazemnykh pozvonochnykh zhivotnykh i zadachi preobrazovaniya prirody SSSR [Quantitative method in zoogeography of terrestrial vertebrate species and transformational changes of the USSR nature]. Izvestiya AN SSSR 2: 62–70. [In Russian]
  6. Gomez A, Salazar A (2016) Towards automatic wild animal monitoring: Identification of animal species in camera-trap images using very deep convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.06169.
  7. Guignard L, Weinberger N (2016) Animal identification from remote camera images. CS231A Class Project, 4 pp.
  8. Johnson CJ, Gillingham MP (2004) Mapping Uncertainty: Sensitivity of Wildlife Habitat Ratings to Expert Opinion. Journal of Applied Ecology 41(6): 1032–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00975.x
  9. Krasnov YuV, Barret RT (2000) Monitoring of seabirds in the Barents Sea. Program offer [Monitoring morskikh ptits v Barentsevom more. Programmnoye predlozheniye]. Russkiy ornitologicheskiy zhurnal 113: 3–22. [In Russian]
  10. LaRue MA, Rotella JJ, Garrott RA, Siniff DB, Ainley DG, Stauffer GE, Porter CC, Morin PJ (2011) Satellite Imagery Can Be Used to Detect Variation in Abundance of Weddell Seals (Leptonychotes weddelli) in Erebus Bay, Antarctica. Polar Biology 34(11): 1727–1737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-011-1023-0
  11. Мedvedev АА, Аlekseenko NА, Karpenko IО (2015) Monitoring of Wildlife in Specially Protected Natural Areas Using Unmanned Aircraft Systems [Monitoring zhivotnogo mira na osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territoriyakh s pomoshch’yu bespilotnykh letatel’nykh apparatov]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN 17(6): 304–309. [In Russian]
  12. Neeraj K, Belhumeur PN, Biswas A, Jacobs DW, Kress WJ, Lopez IC, Soares JVB (2012) Leafsnap: A computer vision system for automatic plant species identification. European Conference on Computer Vision, 502–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33709-3_36
  13. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2010) Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Global Biodiversity Outlook. Version 2010. https://www.cbd.int/doc/gbo/gbo2/cbd-gbo2-en.pdf [Accessed 2019 November 3]
  14. Semenova VS, Knizhnikov AYu, Boltunov AN, Evtushenko NV (2011) Study of the Population of Atlantic Walrus in the Barents Sea with the Aid of Space Technologies [Izuchenie populyatsii atlanticheskogo morzha v Barentsevom more s pomoshch’yu kosmicheskikh tekhnologiy]. Zemlya iz kosmosa: naibolee effektivnye resheneniya 10: 89–90. [In Russian]
  15. Stapleton S, LaRue M, Lecomte N, Atkinson S, Garshelis D, Porter C, Atwood T (2014) Polar Bears from Space: Assessing Satellite Imagery as a Tool to Track Arctic Wildlife. PLoS ONE 9(7): e101513. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101513
  16. Survey123 for ArcGIS (2019) Survey123 for ArcGIS. https://doc.arcgis.com/ru/survey123/desktop/create-surveys/createsurveys.htm [accessed 20 May 2019]
  17. The Federal Law of the Russian Federation of March 14, 1995 (2000) The Federal Law of the Russian Federation of March 14, 1995 “On Specially Protected Nature Territories of the Russian Federation”. Sbornik rukovodyashchikh dokumentov po zapovednomy delu [Collection of guiding documents on reserve management and studies]. Moscow, 20 pp. [In Russian]
  18. Valentsev AS, Voropanov VYu, Gordienko VN, Lebedko AV (2002) Monitoring and population management of brown bears in Kamchatka [Monitoring i upravlenie populyatsiey burgoo medvedya na Kamchatke]. Sovremennye problemy prirodopolzovaniya, okhotovedeniya i zverovodstva: Materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-praktich. konf., posvyashchennoi 80-letiyu VNIIOZ (28–31 maya 2002 g.) [Modern Problems of Nature Management, Game Management and Animal Breeding: Materials of the International Research and Practice Conference dedicated to 80th Anniversary of All-Russian Research Institute for Hunting Husbandry and Livestock Breeding (28–31 May, 2002)]. Kirov, 168–170. [In Russian]
  19. Yu X, Wang J, Roland K, Jansen PA, Wang T, Huang T (2013) Automated Identification of Animal Species in Camera Trap Images. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, 2013(1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-5281-2013-52