UDC

519.688

Authors

O.I. Bederdinova*, Yu.A. Boytsova*
*Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov (Severodvinsk, Arkhangelsk region, Russian Federation)
Corresponding author: Oksana Bederdinova, address: Captain Voronin str., 6, Severodvinsk, Arkhangelsk region, 164520, Russian Federation; е-mail: O.Bederdinova@narfu.ru

Abstract

The paper presents the methodology of the software integral qualitative estimation in the form of a fourlevel hierarchical model, regulated by the State Standard 28195–89. The results of the domain analysis on the IDEF0 notation, as well as the design of the automated system specification in accordance with the UML notation and information support on the IDEF1X notation are demonstrated. A created physical layout chart of the automated system on the UML notation with the Component Assignments description used for its operation is presented. The interface of the software quality evaluation automated system in an object-oriented development environment Visual Studio 2008 in the programming language C # is described. In the automated system we implement the work with the reference tables of information from the standards and with the results of the executed evaluation projects. Data retrieval of the reference list is possible by a project number, a date of compilation, a software name and an executive. According to the projects results the acts of the admissibility of the required quality level of the assessed software with the ability to save files in different formats and print output are generated. Created unified forms for adding data in all directories allow us to avoid a multiplicity of forms and eliminate the errors when entering data in the directories. The automated system will ensure the reliability of evaluation and improve the efficiency of determining the software quality characteristics of different divisions.

Keywords

quality factor, software, hierarchical model, automated system

References

1. Lipaev V.V. Otsenka kachestva programmnykh sredstv [Qualitative Assessment of Software]. Setevoy zhurnal, 2002, no. 3, pp. 31–38. 
2. Lipaev V.V. O problemakh otsenivaniya kachestva programmnykh sredstv [On the Problems of the Qualitative Assessment of Software]. Informatsionnye tekhnologii [Information Technologies], 2002, no. 4, pp. 19–23. 
3. Yudin S.V. Nekotorye problemy otsenki kachestva i nadezhnosti programmnykh produktov [Some Problems of the Software Quality Evaluation and Reliability]. Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Tekhnicheskie nauki [News of the Tula State University. Ser.: Technical Sciences], 2012, no. 1, pp. 465–470. 
4. Burakov V.V. Metodika otsenki kachestva programmnykh sredstv [Evaluation Method of the Software Quality]. Izvestiya vuzov. Priborostroenie [Journal of Instrument Engineering], 2008, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 13–18. 
5. Danilina T.G. Otsenka kachestva programmnogo obespecheniya v sootvetstvii s mezhdunarodnymi standartami [Software Quality Evaluation in Accordance with the International Standards]. Radioelektronnye i komp’yuternye sistemy [Radioelectronic and Computer Systems], 2012, no. 7, pp. 266–269. 
6. Bederdinova O.I., Boytsova Yu.A. Kontseptual’naya model’ otsenivaniya kachestva programmnykh sredstv [A Conceptual Model of a Software Quality Assessment]. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Estestvennye nauki, 2014, no. 4, pp. 112–120. 
7. Bederdinova O.I., Koryakovskaya N.V., Boytsova Yu.A. Informatsionnaya model’ avtomatizirovannoy sistemy otsenki kachestva programmnykh sredstv [Information Model of the Software Quality Assessment Automated System]. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Estestvennye nauki, 2015, no. 1, pp. 107–113. 
8. Bederdinova O.I., Koryakovskaya N.V., Boytsova Yu.A. Staticheskaya model’ sistemy otsenivaniya kachestva programmnykh sredstv [Static Model of the Software Quality Assessment System]. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Estestvennye nauki, 2015, no. 3, pp. 87–96.